Files
RedBear-OS/local/recipes/dev/libclc/source/clang/test/SemaOpenACC/compute-construct-self-clause.c
T
vasilito cb424d7448 build: static patch-sanity linter (shift-left the malformed-patch class)
verify-patch-sanity.py validates every active recipe .patch has internally-
consistent hunk line counts — catching the 'malformed patch at line N' failure
at commit/CI/preflight time instead of hours into a cook. This cycle hit that
class three times (qtwaylandscanner, sddm, xwayland), each only discovered when
cookbook tried to apply the patch.

Running it across the repo found 29 latent malformed patches (validated against
GNU patch: e.g. relibc/P3-sysv-ipc reproduces 'malformed patch at line 22').
They were harmless only because they sit in vendored recipes (baked, not re-
applied) — but would fail on any version-bump re-derivation. --fix recounts the
hunk headers (body untouched) and repaired all 29.

Wired into build-preflight.sh (Phase 1.0D) and redbear-ci.yml, with a unit test
(test-patch-sanity.sh). Skips archived/legacy trees and unvalidatable formats
(empty placeholders, bare-@@ git hunks).
2026-08-01 05:13:02 +03:00

87 lines
2.6 KiB
C

// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -fopenacc -verify
void BoolExpr(int *I, float *F) {
typedef struct {} SomeStruct;
struct C{};
// expected-error@+1{{expected expression}}
#pragma acc parallel self (struct C f())
while(0);
// expected-error@+1{{unexpected type name 'SomeStruct': expected expression}}
#pragma acc serial self (SomeStruct)
while(0);
// expected-error@+1{{unexpected type name 'SomeStruct': expected expression}}
#pragma acc serial self (SomeStruct())
while(0);
SomeStruct S;
// expected-error@+1{{statement requires expression of scalar type ('SomeStruct' invalid)}}
#pragma acc serial self (S)
while(0);
#pragma acc parallel self (I)
while(0);
#pragma acc serial self (F)
while(0);
#pragma acc kernels self (*I < *F)
while(0);
}
void WarnMaybeNotUsed(int val1, int val2) {
// expected-warning@+2{{OpenACC construct 'self' has no effect when an 'if' clause evaluates to true}}
// expected-note@+1{{previous 'self' clause is here}}
#pragma acc parallel self if(val1)
while(0);
// expected-warning@+2{{OpenACC construct 'self' has no effect when an 'if' clause evaluates to true}}
// expected-note@+1{{previous 'self' clause is here}}
#pragma acc parallel self(val1) if(val1)
while(0);
// expected-warning@+2{{OpenACC construct 'self' has no effect when an 'if' clause evaluates to true}}
// expected-note@+1{{previous 'if' clause is here}}
#pragma acc parallel if(val1) self
while(0);
// expected-warning@+2{{OpenACC construct 'self' has no effect when an 'if' clause evaluates to true}}
// expected-note@+1{{previous 'if' clause is here}}
#pragma acc parallel if(val1) self(val2)
while(0);
// The below don't warn because one side or the other has an error, thus is
// not added to the AST.
// expected-error@+1{{use of undeclared identifier 'invalid'}}
#pragma acc parallel self if(invalid)
while(0);
// expected-error@+1{{use of undeclared identifier 'invalid'}}
#pragma acc parallel self(invalid) if(val1)
while(0);
// expected-error@+2{{expected expression}}
// expected-error@+1{{use of undeclared identifier 'invalid'}}
#pragma acc parallel self() if(invalid)
while(0);
// expected-error@+1{{use of undeclared identifier 'invalid'}}
#pragma acc parallel if(invalid) self
while(0);
// expected-error@+1{{use of undeclared identifier 'invalid'}}
#pragma acc parallel if(val2) self(invalid)
while(0);
// expected-error@+1{{use of undeclared identifier 'invalid'}}
#pragma acc parallel if(invalid) self(val1)
while(0);
// expected-error@+1{{OpenACC 'self' clause is not valid on 'loop' directive}}
#pragma acc loop self
for(int i = 5; i < 10;++i);
}