vasilito
cb424d7448
verify-patch-sanity.py validates every active recipe .patch has internally- consistent hunk line counts — catching the 'malformed patch at line N' failure at commit/CI/preflight time instead of hours into a cook. This cycle hit that class three times (qtwaylandscanner, sddm, xwayland), each only discovered when cookbook tried to apply the patch. Running it across the repo found 29 latent malformed patches (validated against GNU patch: e.g. relibc/P3-sysv-ipc reproduces 'malformed patch at line 22'). They were harmless only because they sit in vendored recipes (baked, not re- applied) — but would fail on any version-bump re-derivation. --fix recounts the hunk headers (body untouched) and repaired all 29. Wired into build-preflight.sh (Phase 1.0D) and redbear-ci.yml, with a unit test (test-patch-sanity.sh). Skips archived/legacy trees and unvalidatable formats (empty placeholders, bare-@@ git hunks).
64 lines
1.5 KiB
C
64 lines
1.5 KiB
C
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -Wmissing-field-initializers %s
|
|
|
|
// This was PR4808.
|
|
|
|
struct Foo { int a, b; };
|
|
|
|
struct Foo foo0 = { 1 }; // expected-warning {{missing field 'b' initializer}}
|
|
struct Foo foo1 = { .a = 1 }; // designator avoids MFI warning
|
|
struct Foo foo2 = { .b = 1 }; // designator avoids MFI warning
|
|
|
|
struct Foo bar0[] = {
|
|
{ 1,2 },
|
|
{ 1 }, // expected-warning {{missing field 'b' initializer}}
|
|
{ 1,2 }
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
struct Foo bar1[] = {
|
|
1, 2,
|
|
1, 2,
|
|
1
|
|
}; // expected-warning {{missing field 'b' initializer}}
|
|
|
|
struct Foo bar2[] = { {}, {}, {} };
|
|
|
|
struct One { int a; int b; };
|
|
struct Two { float c; float d; float e; };
|
|
|
|
struct Three {
|
|
union {
|
|
struct One one;
|
|
struct Two two;
|
|
} both;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
struct Three t0 = {
|
|
{ .one = { 1, 2 } }
|
|
};
|
|
struct Three t1 = {
|
|
{ .two = { 1.0f, 2.0f, 3.0f } }
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
struct Three data[] = {
|
|
{ { .one = { 1, 2 } } },
|
|
{ { .one = { 1 } } }, // expected-warning {{missing field 'b' initializer}}
|
|
{ { .two = { 1.0f, 2.0f, 3.0f } } },
|
|
{ { .two = { 1.0f, 2.0f } } } // expected-warning {{missing field 'e' initializer}}
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
struct { int:5; int a; int:5; int b; int:5; } noNamedImplicit[] = {
|
|
{ 1, 2 },
|
|
{ 1 } // expected-warning {{missing field 'b' initializer}}
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
// GH66300
|
|
struct S {
|
|
int f0;
|
|
int f1[];
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
// We previously would accidentally diagnose missing a field initializer for
|
|
// f1, now we no longer issue that warning (note, this code is still unsafe
|
|
// because of the buffer overrun).
|
|
struct S s = {1, {1, 2}};
|