Files
RedBear-OS/local/recipes/dev/libclc/source/clang/test/Sema/init-randomized-struct.c
T
vasilito cb424d7448 build: static patch-sanity linter (shift-left the malformed-patch class)
verify-patch-sanity.py validates every active recipe .patch has internally-
consistent hunk line counts — catching the 'malformed patch at line N' failure
at commit/CI/preflight time instead of hours into a cook. This cycle hit that
class three times (qtwaylandscanner, sddm, xwayland), each only discovered when
cookbook tried to apply the patch.

Running it across the repo found 29 latent malformed patches (validated against
GNU patch: e.g. relibc/P3-sysv-ipc reproduces 'malformed patch at line 22').
They were harmless only because they sit in vendored recipes (baked, not re-
applied) — but would fail on any version-bump re-derivation. --fix recounts the
hunk headers (body untouched) and repaired all 29.

Wired into build-preflight.sh (Phase 1.0D) and redbear-ci.yml, with a unit test
(test-patch-sanity.sh). Skips archived/legacy trees and unvalidatable formats
(empty placeholders, bare-@@ git hunks).
2026-08-01 05:13:02 +03:00

124 lines
3.8 KiB
C

// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple=x86_64-unknown-linux -frandomize-layout-seed=1234567890abcded \
// RUN: -verify -fsyntax-only -Werror %s
// NOTE: The current seed (1234567890abcded) is specifically chosen because it
// uncovered a bug in diagnostics. With it the randomization of "t9" places the
// "a" element at the end of the record. When that happens, the clang complains
// about excessive initializers, which is confusing, because there aren't
// excessive initializers. It should instead complain about using a
// non-designated initializer on a raqndomized struct.
// Initializing a randomized structure requires a designated initializer,
// otherwise the element ordering will be off. The only exceptions to this rule
// are:
//
// - A structure with only one element, and
// - A structure initialized with "{0}".
//
// These are well-defined situations where the field ordering doesn't affect
// the result.
typedef void (*func_ptr)();
void foo(void);
void bar(void);
void baz(void);
void gaz(void);
struct test {
func_ptr a;
func_ptr b;
func_ptr c;
func_ptr d;
func_ptr e;
func_ptr f;
func_ptr g;
} __attribute__((randomize_layout));
struct test t1 = {}; // This should be fine per WG14 N2900 (in C23) + our extension handling of it in earlier modes
struct test t2 = { 0 }; // This should also be fine per C99 6.7.8p19
struct test t3 = { .f = baz, .b = bar, .g = gaz, .a = foo }; // Okay
struct test t4 = { .a = foo, bar, baz }; // expected-error {{a randomized struct can only be initialized with a designated initializer}}
struct other_test {
func_ptr a;
func_ptr b[3];
func_ptr c;
} __attribute__((randomize_layout));
struct other_test t5 = { .a = foo, .b[0] = foo }; // Okay
struct other_test t6 = { .a = foo, .b[0] = foo, bar, baz }; // Okay
struct other_test t7 = { .a = foo, .b = { foo, bar, baz } }; // Okay
struct other_test t8 = { baz, bar, gaz, foo }; // expected-error {{a randomized struct can only be initialized with a designated initializer}}
struct other_test t9 = { .a = foo, .b[0] = foo, bar, baz, gaz }; // expected-error {{a randomized struct can only be initialized with a designated initializer}}
struct empty_test {
} __attribute__((randomize_layout));
struct empty_test t10 = {}; // Okay
struct degen_test {
func_ptr a;
} __attribute__((randomize_layout));
struct degen_test t11 = { foo }; // Okay
struct static_assert_test {
int f;
_Static_assert(sizeof(int) == 4, "oh no!");
} __attribute__((randomize_layout));
struct static_assert_test t12 = { 42 }; // Okay
struct enum_decl_test {
enum e { BORK = 42, FORK = 9 } f;
} __attribute__((randomize_layout));
struct enum_decl_test t13 = { BORK }; // Okay
struct mixed {
int a;
short b;
unsigned c;
char d;
} __attribute__((randomize_layout));
struct mixed t14 = { 7 }; // expected-error {{a randomized struct can only be initialized with a designated initializer}}
struct mixed t15 = { .b = 8 }; // Okay
// This should be autodetected as randomized.
struct funcs {
func_ptr a;
func_ptr b;
func_ptr c;
func_ptr d;
};
struct funcs t16 = { .c = foo }; // Okay
struct funcs t17 = { foo }; // expected-error {{a randomized struct can only be initialized with a designated initializer}}
// This should be forced off.
struct funcs_unshuffled {
func_ptr a;
func_ptr b;
func_ptr c;
func_ptr d;
} __attribute__((no_randomize_layout));
struct funcs_unshuffled t18 = { .d = foo }; // Okay
struct funcs_unshuffled t19 = { foo }; // Okay
// This is still all function pointers.
// https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/138355
struct funcs_composite {
func_ptr a;
func_ptr b;
struct funcs inner;
func_ptr c;
func_ptr d;
};
struct funcs_composite t20 = { .a = foo }; // Okay
struct funcs_composite t21 = { .inner.c = foo }; // Okay
struct funcs_composite t22 = { foo }; // expected-error {{a randomized struct can only be initialized with a designated initializer}}