cb424d7448
verify-patch-sanity.py validates every active recipe .patch has internally- consistent hunk line counts — catching the 'malformed patch at line N' failure at commit/CI/preflight time instead of hours into a cook. This cycle hit that class three times (qtwaylandscanner, sddm, xwayland), each only discovered when cookbook tried to apply the patch. Running it across the repo found 29 latent malformed patches (validated against GNU patch: e.g. relibc/P3-sysv-ipc reproduces 'malformed patch at line 22'). They were harmless only because they sit in vendored recipes (baked, not re- applied) — but would fail on any version-bump re-derivation. --fix recounts the hunk headers (body untouched) and repaired all 29. Wired into build-preflight.sh (Phase 1.0D) and redbear-ci.yml, with a unit test (test-patch-sanity.sh). Skips archived/legacy trees and unvalidatable formats (empty placeholders, bare-@@ git hunks).
29 lines
1.2 KiB
C++
29 lines
1.2 KiB
C++
// RUN: %clang_cc1 %s -triple=x86_64-apple-darwin -debug-info-kind=limited -emit-llvm -o - | FileCheck %s
|
|
// This test is for a crash when emitting debug info for not-yet-completed
|
|
// types.
|
|
// Test that we don't actually emit a forward decl for the offending class:
|
|
// CHECK: !DICompositeType(tag: DW_TAG_structure_type, name: "Derived<int>"
|
|
// CHECK-NOT: DIFlagFwdDecl
|
|
// CHECK-SAME: ){{$}}
|
|
template <class A> class Derived;
|
|
|
|
template <class A> class Base {
|
|
static Derived<A> *create();
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
template <class A> struct Derived : Base<A> {
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
Base<int> *f;
|
|
|
|
// During the instantiation of Derived<int>, Base<int> becomes required to be
|
|
// complete - since the declaration has already been emitted (due to 'f',
|
|
// above), we immediately try to build debug info for Base<int> which then
|
|
// requires the (incomplete definition) of Derived<int> which is problematic.
|
|
//
|
|
// (if 'f' is not present, the point at which Base<int> becomes required to be
|
|
// complete during the instantiation of Derived<int> is a no-op because
|
|
// Base<int> was never emitted so we ignore it and carry on until we
|
|
// wire up the base class of Derived<int> in the debug info later on)
|
|
Derived<int> d;
|