Files
RedBear-OS/local/recipes/dev/libclc/source/clang/test/CodeGen/fp-contract-on-pragma.cpp
T
vasilito cb424d7448 build: static patch-sanity linter (shift-left the malformed-patch class)
verify-patch-sanity.py validates every active recipe .patch has internally-
consistent hunk line counts — catching the 'malformed patch at line N' failure
at commit/CI/preflight time instead of hours into a cook. This cycle hit that
class three times (qtwaylandscanner, sddm, xwayland), each only discovered when
cookbook tried to apply the patch.

Running it across the repo found 29 latent malformed patches (validated against
GNU patch: e.g. relibc/P3-sysv-ipc reproduces 'malformed patch at line 22').
They were harmless only because they sit in vendored recipes (baked, not re-
applied) — but would fail on any version-bump re-derivation. --fix recounts the
hunk headers (body untouched) and repaired all 29.

Wired into build-preflight.sh (Phase 1.0D) and redbear-ci.yml, with a unit test
(test-patch-sanity.sh). Skips archived/legacy trees and unvalidatable formats
(empty placeholders, bare-@@ git hunks).
2026-08-01 05:13:02 +03:00

77 lines
2.0 KiB
C++

// RUN: %clang_cc1 -O3 -triple %itanium_abi_triple -emit-llvm -o - %s | FileCheck %s
// Is FP_CONTRACT honored in a simple case?
float fp_contract_1(float a, float b, float c) {
// CHECK: _Z13fp_contract_1fff
// CHECK: tail call float @llvm.fmuladd
#pragma clang fp contract(on)
return a * b + c;
}
// Is FP_CONTRACT state cleared on exiting compound statements?
float fp_contract_2(float a, float b, float c) {
// CHECK: _Z13fp_contract_2fff
// CHECK: %[[M:.+]] = fmul float %a, %b
// CHECK-NEXT: fadd float %[[M]], %c
{
#pragma clang fp contract(on)
}
return a * b + c;
}
// Does FP_CONTRACT survive template instantiation?
class Foo {};
Foo operator+(Foo, Foo);
template <typename T>
T template_muladd(T a, T b, T c) {
#pragma clang fp contract(on)
return a * b + c;
}
float fp_contract_3(float a, float b, float c) {
// CHECK: _Z13fp_contract_3fff
// CHECK: tail call noundef float @llvm.fmuladd
return template_muladd<float>(a, b, c);
}
template <typename T>
class fp_contract_4 {
float method(float a, float b, float c) {
#pragma clang fp contract(on)
return a * b + c;
}
};
template class fp_contract_4<int>;
// CHECK: _ZN13fp_contract_4IiE6methodEfff
// CHECK: tail call float @llvm.fmuladd
// Check file-scoped FP_CONTRACT
#pragma clang fp contract(on)
float fp_contract_5(float a, float b, float c) {
// CHECK: _Z13fp_contract_5fff
// CHECK: tail call float @llvm.fmuladd
return a * b + c;
}
#pragma clang fp contract(off)
float fp_contract_6(float a, float b, float c) {
// CHECK: _Z13fp_contract_6fff
// CHECK: %[[M:.+]] = fmul float %a, %b
// CHECK-NEXT: fadd float %[[M]], %c
return a * b + c;
}
// If the multiply has multiple uses, don't produce fmuladd.
// This used to assert (PR25719):
// https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25719
float fp_contract_7(float a, float b, float c) {
// CHECK: _Z13fp_contract_7fff
// CHECK: %[[M:.+]] = fmul float %b, 2.000000e+00
// CHECK-NEXT: fsub float %[[M]], %c
#pragma clang fp contract(on)
return (a = 2 * b) - c;
}