vasilito/RedBear-OS
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions 3 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
Files
e0590a0b56fc16eb7f8a3d3a2aba1a856f6103f0
RedBear-OS/local/recipes/dev/libclc/source/llvm/test/Demangle/ms-cxx11.test
T
vasilito cb424d7448 build: static patch-sanity linter (shift-left the malformed-patch class) 
verify-patch-sanity.py validates every active recipe .patch has internally-
consistent hunk line counts — catching the 'malformed patch at line N' failure
at commit/CI/preflight time instead of hours into a cook. This cycle hit that
class three times (qtwaylandscanner, sddm, xwayland), each only discovered when
cookbook tried to apply the patch.

Running it across the repo found 29 latent malformed patches (validated against
GNU patch: e.g. relibc/P3-sysv-ipc reproduces 'malformed patch at line 22').
They were harmless only because they sit in vendored recipes (baked, not re-
applied) — but would fail on any version-bump re-derivation. --fix recounts the
hunk headers (body untouched) and repaired all 29.

Wired into build-preflight.sh (Phase 1.0D) and redbear-ci.yml, with a unit test
(test-patch-sanity.sh). Skips archived/legacy trees and unvalidatable formats
(empty placeholders, bare-@@ git hunks).
2026-08-01 05:13:02 +03:00

151 lines
5.9 KiB
Plaintext
Raw Blame History

; These tests are based on clang/test/CodeGenCXX/mangle-ms-cxx11.cpp
; RUN: llvm-undname < %s | FileCheck %s
; CHECK-NOT: Invalid mangled name
?a@FTypeWithQuals@@3U?$S@$$A8@@BAHXZ@1@A
; CHECK: struct FTypeWithQuals::S<int __cdecl(void) const> FTypeWithQuals::a
?b@FTypeWithQuals@@3U?$S@$$A8@@CAHXZ@1@A
; CHECK: struct FTypeWithQuals::S<int __cdecl(void) volatile> FTypeWithQuals::b
?c@FTypeWithQuals@@3U?$S@$$A8@@IAAHXZ@1@A
; CHECK: struct FTypeWithQuals::S<int __cdecl(void) __restrict> FTypeWithQuals::c
?d@FTypeWithQuals@@3U?$S@$$A8@@GBAHXZ@1@A
; CHECK: struct FTypeWithQuals::S<int __cdecl(void) const &> FTypeWithQuals::d
?e@FTypeWithQuals@@3U?$S@$$A8@@GCAHXZ@1@A
; CHECK: struct FTypeWithQuals::S<int __cdecl(void) volatile &> FTypeWithQuals::e
?f@FTypeWithQuals@@3U?$S@$$A8@@IGAAHXZ@1@A
; CHECK: struct FTypeWithQuals::S<int __cdecl(void) __restrict &> FTypeWithQuals::f
?g@FTypeWithQuals@@3U?$S@$$A8@@HBAHXZ@1@A
; CHECK: struct FTypeWithQuals::S<int __cdecl(void) const &&> FTypeWithQuals::g
?h@FTypeWithQuals@@3U?$S@$$A8@@HCAHXZ@1@A
; CHECK: struct FTypeWithQuals::S<int __cdecl(void) volatile &&> FTypeWithQuals::h
?i@FTypeWithQuals@@3U?$S@$$A8@@IHAAHXZ@1@A
; CHECK: struct FTypeWithQuals::S<int __cdecl(void) __restrict &&> FTypeWithQuals::i
?j@FTypeWithQuals@@3U?$S@$$A6AHXZ@1@A
; CHECK: struct FTypeWithQuals::S<int __cdecl(void)> FTypeWithQuals::j
?k@FTypeWithQuals@@3U?$S@$$A8@@GAAHXZ@1@A
; CHECK: struct FTypeWithQuals::S<int __cdecl(void) &> FTypeWithQuals::k
?l@FTypeWithQuals@@3U?$S@$$A8@@HAAHXZ@1@A
; CHECK: struct FTypeWithQuals::S<int __cdecl(void) &&> FTypeWithQuals::l
?Char16Var@@3_SA
; CHECK: char16_t Char16Var
?Char32Var@@3_UA
; CHECK: char32_t Char32Var
?LRef@@YAXAAH@Z
; CHECK: void __cdecl LRef(int &)
?RRef@@YAH$$QAH@Z
; CHECK: int __cdecl RRef(int &&)
?Null@@YAX$$T@Z
; CHECK: void __cdecl Null(std::nullptr_t)
?fun@PR18022@@YA?AU<unnamed-type-a>@1@U21@0@Z
; CHECK: struct PR18022::<unnamed-type-a> __cdecl PR18022::fun(struct PR18022::<unnamed-type-a>, struct PR18022::<unnamed-type-a>)
; First, we have the static local variable of type "<lambda_1>" inside of "define_lambda".
; decltype(lambda), where lambda = [] { static int local=42; return 42; };
?lambda@?1??define_lambda@@YAHXZ@4V<lambda_1>@?0??1@YAHXZ@A
; CHECK: class `int __cdecl define_lambda(void)'::`1'::<lambda_1> `int __cdecl define_lambda(void)'::`2'::lambda
; Next, we have the "operator()" for "<lambda_1>" which is inside of "define_lambda".
??R<lambda_1>@?0??define_lambda@@YAHXZ@QBE@XZ
; CHECK: __thiscall `int __cdecl define_lambda(void)'::`1'::<lambda_1>::operator()(void) const
; Finally, we have the local which is inside of "<lambda_1>" which is inside of "define_lambda".
?local@?2???R<lambda_1>@?0??define_lambda@@YAHXZ@QBE@XZ@4HA
; CHECK: __thiscall `int __cdecl define_lambda(void)'::`1'::<lambda_1>::operator()(void) const
??$use_lambda_arg@V<lambda_1>@?0??call_with_lambda_arg1@@YAXXZ@@@YAXV<lambda_1>@?0??call_with_lambda_arg1@@YAXXZ@@Z
; CHECK: void __cdecl use_lambda_arg<class `void __cdecl call_with_lambda_arg1(void)'::`1'::<lambda_1>>(class `void __cdecl call_with_lambda_arg1(void)'::`1'::<lambda_1>)
?foo@A@PR19361@@QIGAEXXZ
; CHECK: void __thiscall PR19361::A::foo(void) __restrict &
?foo@A@PR19361@@QIHAEXXZ
; CHECK: void __thiscall PR19361::A::foo(void) __restrict &&
??__K_deg@@YAHO@Z
; CHECK: int __cdecl operator ""_deg(long double)
??$templ_fun_with_pack@$S@@YAXXZ
; CHECK: void __cdecl templ_fun_with_pack<>(void)
; $$Z is a parameter pack separator.
??$func@H$$ZH@@YAHAEBU?$Foo@H@@0@Z
; CHECK: int __cdecl func<int, int>(struct Foo<int> const &, struct Foo<int> const &)
??$templ_fun_with_ty_pack@$$$V@@YAXXZ
; CHECK: void __cdecl templ_fun_with_ty_pack<>(void)
??$templ_fun_with_ty_pack@$$V@@YAXXZ
; CHECK: void __cdecl templ_fun_with_ty_pack<>(void)
??$f@$$YAliasA@PR20047@@@PR20047@@YAXXZ
; CHECK: void __cdecl PR20047::f<PR20047::AliasA>(void)
?f@UnnamedType@@YAXAAU<unnamed-type-TD>@A@1@@Z
; CHECK: void __cdecl UnnamedType::f(struct UnnamedType::A::<unnamed-type-TD> &)
?f@UnnamedType@@YAXPAW4<unnamed-type-e>@?$B@H@1@@Z
; CHECK: void __cdecl UnnamedType::f(enum UnnamedType::B<int>::<unnamed-type-e> *)
??$f@W4<unnamed-type-E>@?1??g@PR24651@@YAXXZ@@PR24651@@YAXW4<unnamed-type-E>@?1??g@0@YAXXZ@@Z
; CHECK: void __cdecl PR24651::f<enum `void __cdecl PR24651::g(void)'::`2'::<unnamed-type-E>>(enum `void __cdecl PR24651::g(void)'::`2'::<unnamed-type-E>)
??$f@T<unnamed-type-$S1>@PR18204@@@PR18204@@YAHPAT<unnamed-type-$S1>@0@@Z
; CHECK: int __cdecl PR18204::f<union PR18204::<unnamed-type-$S1>>(union PR18204::<unnamed-type-$S1> *)
??R<lambda_0>@?0??PR26105@@YAHXZ@QBE@H@Z
; CHECK: public: __thiscall `int __cdecl PR26105(void)'::`1'::<lambda_0>::operator()(int) const
??R<lambda_1>@?0???R<lambda_0>@?0??PR26105@@YAHXZ@QBE@H@Z@QBE@H@Z
; CHECK: public: __thiscall `public: __thiscall `int __cdecl PR26105(void)'::`1'::<lambda_0>::operator()(int) const'::`1'::<lambda_1>::operator()(int) const
?unaligned_foo1@@YAPFAHXZ
; CHECK: int __unaligned * __cdecl unaligned_foo1(void)
?unaligned_foo2@@YAPFAPFAHXZ
; CHECK: int __unaligned *__unaligned * __cdecl unaligned_foo2(void)
?unaligned_foo3@@YAHXZ
; CHECK: int __cdecl unaligned_foo3(void)
?unaligned_foo4@@YAXPFAH@Z
; CHECK: void __cdecl unaligned_foo4(int __unaligned *)
?unaligned_foo5@@YAXPIFAH@Z
; CHECK: void __cdecl unaligned_foo5(int __unaligned *__restrict)
??$unaligned_foo6@PAH@@YAPAHPAH@Z
; CHECK: int * __cdecl unaligned_foo6<int *>(int *)
??$unaligned_foo6@PFAH@@YAPFAHPFAH@Z
; CHECK: int __unaligned * __cdecl unaligned_foo6<int __unaligned *>(int __unaligned *)
?unaligned_foo8@unaligned_foo8_S@@QFCEXXZ
; CHECK: void __thiscall unaligned_foo8_S::unaligned_foo8(void) volatile __unaligned
??R<lambda_1>@x@A@PR31197@@QBE@XZ
; CHECK: __thiscall PR31197::A::x::<lambda_1>::operator()(void) const
?white@?1???R<lambda_1>@x@A@PR31197@@QBE@XZ@4HA
; CHECK: int `public: __thiscall PR31197::A::x::<lambda_1>::operator()(void) const'::`2'::white
?f@@YAXW4<unnamed-enum-enumerator>@@@Z
; CHECK: void __cdecl f(enum <unnamed-enum-enumerator>)
Reference in New Issue View Git Blame Copy Permalink