vasilito
cb424d7448
verify-patch-sanity.py validates every active recipe .patch has internally- consistent hunk line counts — catching the 'malformed patch at line N' failure at commit/CI/preflight time instead of hours into a cook. This cycle hit that class three times (qtwaylandscanner, sddm, xwayland), each only discovered when cookbook tried to apply the patch. Running it across the repo found 29 latent malformed patches (validated against GNU patch: e.g. relibc/P3-sysv-ipc reproduces 'malformed patch at line 22'). They were harmless only because they sit in vendored recipes (baked, not re- applied) — but would fail on any version-bump re-derivation. --fix recounts the hunk headers (body untouched) and repaired all 29. Wired into build-preflight.sh (Phase 1.0D) and redbear-ci.yml, with a unit test (test-patch-sanity.sh). Skips archived/legacy trees and unvalidatable formats (empty placeholders, bare-@@ git hunks).
84 lines
4.2 KiB
Fortran
84 lines
4.2 KiB
Fortran
! This file tests the -Rpass family of flags (-Rpass, -Rpass-missed
|
|
! and -Rpass-analysis)
|
|
! loop-delete isn't enabled at O0 so we use at least O1
|
|
|
|
! DEFINE: %{output} = -emit-llvm -flang-deprecated-no-hlfir -o /dev/null 2>&1
|
|
|
|
! Check fc1 can handle -Rpass
|
|
! RUN: %flang_fc1 %s -O1 -vectorize-loops -Rpass %{output} 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=REMARKS
|
|
|
|
! Check that we can override -Rpass= with -Rno-pass.
|
|
! RUN: %flang_fc1 %s -O1 -vectorize-loops -Rpass -Rno-pass %{output} 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --allow-empty --check-prefix=NO-REMARKS
|
|
|
|
! Check -Rno-pass, -Rno-pass-analysis, -Rno-pass-missed nothing emitted
|
|
! RUN: %flang %s -O2 -Rno-pass -S %{output} 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --allow-empty --check-prefix=NO-REMARKS
|
|
! RUN: %flang %s -O2 -Rno-pass-missed -S %{output} 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --allow-empty --check-prefix=NO-REMARKS
|
|
! RUN: %flang %s -O2 -Rno-pass-analysis -S %{output} 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --allow-empty --check-prefix=NO-REMARKS
|
|
|
|
! Check valid -Rpass regex
|
|
! RUN: %flang %s -O2 -Rpass=loop -S %{output} 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=PASS-REGEX-LOOP-ONLY
|
|
|
|
! Check valid -Rpass-missed regex
|
|
! RUN: %flang %s -O2 -Rpass-missed=loop -S %{output} 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=MISSED-REGEX-LOOP-ONLY
|
|
|
|
! Check valid -Rpass-analysis regex
|
|
! RUN: %flang %s -O2 -Rpass-analysis=loop -S %{output} 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=ANALYSIS-REGEX-LOOP-ONLY
|
|
|
|
! Check full -Rpass message is emitted
|
|
! RUN: %flang %s -O2 -Rpass -S %{output} 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=PASS
|
|
|
|
! Check full -Rpass-missed message is emitted
|
|
! RUN: %flang %s -O2 -Rpass-missed -S %{output} 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=MISSED
|
|
|
|
! Check full -Rpass-analysis message is emitted
|
|
! RUN: %flang %s -O2 -Rpass-analysis -S -o /dev/null 2>&1 | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=ANALYSIS
|
|
|
|
! REMARKS: remark:
|
|
! NO-REMARKS-NOT: remark:
|
|
|
|
|
|
! With plain -Rpass, -Rpass-missed or -Rpass-analysis, we expect remarks related to 2 opportunities (loop vectorisation / loop delete and load hoisting).
|
|
! Once we start filtering, this is reduced to 1 one of the loop passes.
|
|
|
|
! PASS-REGEX-LOOP-ONLY-NOT: optimization-remark.f90:77:7: remark: hoisting load [-Rpass=licm]
|
|
! PASS-REGEX-LOOP-ONLY: optimization-remark.f90:79:5: remark: Loop deleted because it is invariant [-Rpass=loop-delete]
|
|
|
|
! MISSED-REGEX-LOOP-ONLY-NOT: optimization-remark.f90:77:7: remark: failed to hoist load with loop-invariant address because load is conditionally executed [-Rpass-missed=licm]
|
|
! MISSED-REGEX-LOOP-ONLY: optimization-remark.f90:72:4: remark: loop not vectorized [-Rpass-missed=loop-vectorize]
|
|
|
|
|
|
! ANALYSIS-REGEX-LOOP-ONLY: optimization-remark.f90:74:7: remark: loop not vectorized: unsafe dependent memory operations in loop
|
|
! ANALYSIS-REGEX-LOOP-ONLY-NOT: remark: {{.*}}: IR instruction count changed from {{[0-9]+}} to {{[0-9]+}}; Delta: {{-?[0-9]+}} [-Rpass-analysis=size-info]
|
|
|
|
! PASS: optimization-remark.f90:79:5: remark: Loop deleted because it is invariant [-Rpass=loop-delete]
|
|
|
|
! MISSED: optimization-remark.f90:73:7: remark: failed to hoist load with loop-invariant address
|
|
! MISSED: optimization-remark.f90:72:4: remark: loop not vectorized [-Rpass-missed=loop-vectorize]
|
|
! MISSED-NOT: optimization-remark.f90:75:7: remark: loop not vectorized: unsafe dependent memory operations in loop. Use #pragma clang loop distribute(enable) to allow loop distribution to attempt to isolate the offending operations into a separate loop
|
|
! MISSED-NOT: Unknown data dependence. Memory location is the same as accessed at optimization-remark.f90:78:7 [-Rpass-analysis=loop-vectorize]
|
|
|
|
! ANALYSIS: optimization-remark.f90:74:7: remark: loop not vectorized: unsafe dependent memory operations in loop.
|
|
! ANALYSIS: remark: {{.*}} instructions in function [-Rpass-analysis=asm-printer]
|
|
|
|
subroutine swap_real(a1, a2)
|
|
implicit none
|
|
|
|
real, dimension(1:2) :: aR1
|
|
integer :: i, n
|
|
real, intent(inout) :: a1(:), a2(:)
|
|
real :: a
|
|
|
|
! Swap
|
|
do i = 1, min(size(a1), size(a2))
|
|
a = a1(i)
|
|
a1(i) = a2(i)
|
|
a2(i) = a
|
|
end do
|
|
|
|
! Do a random loop to generate a successful loop-delete pass
|
|
do n = 1,2
|
|
aR1(n) = n * 1.34
|
|
end do
|
|
|
|
end subroutine swap_real
|