vasilito
cb424d7448
verify-patch-sanity.py validates every active recipe .patch has internally- consistent hunk line counts — catching the 'malformed patch at line N' failure at commit/CI/preflight time instead of hours into a cook. This cycle hit that class three times (qtwaylandscanner, sddm, xwayland), each only discovered when cookbook tried to apply the patch. Running it across the repo found 29 latent malformed patches (validated against GNU patch: e.g. relibc/P3-sysv-ipc reproduces 'malformed patch at line 22'). They were harmless only because they sit in vendored recipes (baked, not re- applied) — but would fail on any version-bump re-derivation. --fix recounts the hunk headers (body untouched) and repaired all 29. Wired into build-preflight.sh (Phase 1.0D) and redbear-ci.yml, with a unit test (test-patch-sanity.sh). Skips archived/legacy trees and unvalidatable formats (empty placeholders, bare-@@ git hunks).
89 lines
3.2 KiB
Plaintext
89 lines
3.2 KiB
Plaintext
// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -triple x86_64-apple-darwin10 -analyzer-checker=core -fblocks -verify -x objective-c++ %s
|
|
// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -std=c++11 -analyzer-checker=core,debug.DumpCFG -fblocks -analyzer-config cfg-rich-constructors=false %s > %t 2>&1
|
|
// RUN: FileCheck --input-file=%t -check-prefixes=CHECK,WARNINGS %s
|
|
// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -std=c++11 -analyzer-checker=core,debug.DumpCFG -fblocks -analyzer-config cfg-rich-constructors=true %s > %t 2>&1
|
|
// RUN: FileCheck --input-file=%t -check-prefixes=CHECK,ANALYZER %s
|
|
|
|
// This file tests how we construct two different flavors of the Clang CFG -
|
|
// the CFG used by the Sema analysis-based warnings and the CFG used by the
|
|
// static analyzer. The difference in the behavior is checked via FileCheck
|
|
// prefixes (WARNINGS and ANALYZER respectively). When introducing new analyzer
|
|
// flags, no new run lines should be added - just these flags would go to the
|
|
// respective line depending on where is it turned on and where is it turned
|
|
// off. Feel free to add tests that test only one of the CFG flavors if you're
|
|
// not sure how the other flavor is supposed to work in your case.
|
|
|
|
// expected-no-diagnostics
|
|
|
|
void testBlockWithoutCopyExpression(int i) {
|
|
// Captures i, with no copy expression.
|
|
(void)(^void() {
|
|
(void)i;
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-LABEL:void testBlockWithoutCopyExpression(int i)
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: [B2 (ENTRY)]
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B1
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: [B1]
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 1: ^{ }
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: (void)([B1.1]) (CStyleCastExpr, ToVoid, void)
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B2
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B0
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: [B0 (EXIT)]
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B1
|
|
|
|
struct StructWithCopyConstructor {
|
|
StructWithCopyConstructor(int i);
|
|
StructWithCopyConstructor(const StructWithCopyConstructor &s);
|
|
};
|
|
void testBlockWithCopyExpression(StructWithCopyConstructor s) {
|
|
// Captures s, with a copy expression calling the copy constructor for StructWithCopyConstructor.
|
|
(void)(^void() {
|
|
(void)s;
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-LABEL:void testBlockWithCopyExpression(StructWithCopyConstructor s)
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: [B2 (ENTRY)]
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B1
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: [B1]
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 1: s
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 2: [B1.1] (ImplicitCastExpr, NoOp, const StructWithCopyConstructor)
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 3: [B1.2] (CXXConstructExpr, const StructWithCopyConstructor)
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 4: ^{ }
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 5: (void)([B1.4]) (CStyleCastExpr, ToVoid, void)
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B2
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B0
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: [B0 (EXIT)]
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B1
|
|
|
|
void testBlockWithCaptureByReference() {
|
|
__block StructWithCopyConstructor s(5);
|
|
// Captures s by reference, so no copy expression.
|
|
(void)(^void() {
|
|
(void)s;
|
|
});
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-LABEL:void testBlockWithCaptureByReference()
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: [B2 (ENTRY)]
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B1
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: [B1]
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 1: 5
|
|
// WARNINGS-NEXT: 2: [B1.1] (CXXConstructExpr, StructWithCopyConstructor)
|
|
// ANALYZER-NEXT: 2: [B1.1] (CXXConstructExpr, [B1.3], StructWithCopyConstructor)
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 3: __attribute__((blocks("byref"))) StructWithCopyConstructor s(5);
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 4: ^{ }
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 5: (void)([B1.4]) (CStyleCastExpr, ToVoid, void)
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B2
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Succs (1): B0
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: [B0 (EXIT)]
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: Preds (1): B1
|