vasilito
cb424d7448
verify-patch-sanity.py validates every active recipe .patch has internally- consistent hunk line counts — catching the 'malformed patch at line N' failure at commit/CI/preflight time instead of hours into a cook. This cycle hit that class three times (qtwaylandscanner, sddm, xwayland), each only discovered when cookbook tried to apply the patch. Running it across the repo found 29 latent malformed patches (validated against GNU patch: e.g. relibc/P3-sysv-ipc reproduces 'malformed patch at line 22'). They were harmless only because they sit in vendored recipes (baked, not re- applied) — but would fail on any version-bump re-derivation. --fix recounts the hunk headers (body untouched) and repaired all 29. Wired into build-preflight.sh (Phase 1.0D) and redbear-ci.yml, with a unit test (test-patch-sanity.sh). Skips archived/legacy trees and unvalidatable formats (empty placeholders, bare-@@ git hunks).
51 lines
2.2 KiB
Objective-C
51 lines
2.2 KiB
Objective-C
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -Wsuper-class-method-mismatch -verify %s
|
|
|
|
@interface Root
|
|
-(void) method_r: (char)ch : (float*)f1 : (int*) x; // expected-note {{previous declaration is here}}
|
|
@end
|
|
|
|
@class Sub;
|
|
|
|
@interface Base : Root
|
|
-(void) method: (int*) x; // expected-note {{previous declaration is here}}
|
|
-(void) method1: (Base*) x; // expected-note {{previous declaration is here}}
|
|
-(void) method2: (Sub*) x; // expected-note{{passing argument to parameter 'x' here}}
|
|
+ method3: (int)x1 : (Base *)x2 : (float)x3; // expected-note {{previous declaration is here}}
|
|
+ mathod4: (id)x1;
|
|
- method5: (int) x : (double) d; // expected-note {{previous declaration is here}}
|
|
- method6: (int) x : (float) d; // expected-note {{previous declaration is here}}
|
|
@end
|
|
|
|
struct A {
|
|
int x,y,z;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
@interface Sub : Base
|
|
-(void) method: (struct A*) a; // expected-warning {{method parameter type 'struct A *' does not match super class method parameter type 'int *'}}
|
|
-(void) method1: (Sub*) x; // expected-warning {{method parameter type 'Sub *' does not match super class method parameter type 'Base *'}}
|
|
-(void) method2: (Base*) x; // no need to warn. At call point we warn if need be.
|
|
+ method3: (int)x1 : (Sub *)x2 : (float)x3; // expected-warning {{method parameter type 'Sub *' does not match super class method parameter type 'Base *'}}
|
|
+ mathod4: (Base*)x1;
|
|
-(void) method_r: (char)ch : (float*)f1 : (Sub*) x; // expected-warning {{method parameter type 'Sub *' does not match super class method parameter type 'int *'}}
|
|
- method5: (int) x : (float) d; // expected-warning {{method parameter type 'float' does not match super class method parameter type 'double'}}
|
|
- method6: (int) x : (double) d; // expected-warning {{method parameter type 'double' does not match super class method parameter type 'float'}}
|
|
@end
|
|
|
|
void f(Base *base, Sub *sub) {
|
|
int x;
|
|
[base method:&x]; // warn. if base is actually 'Sub' it will use -[Sub method] with wrong arguments
|
|
|
|
Base *b;
|
|
[base method1:b]; // if base is actuall 'Sub' it will use [Sub method1] with wrong argument.
|
|
|
|
[base method2:b]; // expected-warning {{}}
|
|
|
|
Sub *s;
|
|
[base method2:s]; // if base is actually 'Sub' OK. Either way OK.
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|