Files
RedBear-OS/local/recipes/dev/libclc/source/clang/test/Modules/concept.cppm
T
vasilito cb424d7448 build: static patch-sanity linter (shift-left the malformed-patch class)
verify-patch-sanity.py validates every active recipe .patch has internally-
consistent hunk line counts — catching the 'malformed patch at line N' failure
at commit/CI/preflight time instead of hours into a cook. This cycle hit that
class three times (qtwaylandscanner, sddm, xwayland), each only discovered when
cookbook tried to apply the patch.

Running it across the repo found 29 latent malformed patches (validated against
GNU patch: e.g. relibc/P3-sysv-ipc reproduces 'malformed patch at line 22').
They were harmless only because they sit in vendored recipes (baked, not re-
applied) — but would fail on any version-bump re-derivation. --fix recounts the
hunk headers (body untouched) and repaired all 29.

Wired into build-preflight.sh (Phase 1.0D) and redbear-ci.yml, with a unit test
(test-patch-sanity.sh). Skips archived/legacy trees and unvalidatable formats
(empty placeholders, bare-@@ git hunks).
2026-08-01 05:13:02 +03:00

105 lines
2.6 KiB
C++

// RUN: rm -rf %t
// RUN: mkdir %t
// RUN: split-file %s %t
//
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 %t/A.cppm -emit-module-interface -o %t/A.pcm
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 -fprebuilt-module-path=%t -I%t -DDIFFERENT %t/B.cppm -verify
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 -fprebuilt-module-path=%t -I%t %t/B.cppm -verify
//
// Testing the behavior of `-fskip-odr-check-in-gmf`
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 -fskip-odr-check-in-gmf %t/A.cppm -emit-module-interface -o %t/A.pcm
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 -fskip-odr-check-in-gmf -fprebuilt-module-path=%t -I%t \
// RUN: -DDIFFERENT -DSKIP_ODR_CHECK_IN_GMF %t/B.cppm -verify
//--- foo.h
#ifndef FOO_H
#define FOO_H
template <class T>
concept Range = requires(T &t) { t.begin(); };
template<class _Tp>
concept __integer_like = true;
template <class _Tp>
concept __member_size = requires(_Tp &&t) { t.size(); };
template <class First, class Second>
concept C = requires(First x, Second y) { x + y; };
struct A {
public:
template <Range T>
using range_type = T;
};
struct __fn {
template <__member_size _Tp>
constexpr __integer_like auto operator()(_Tp&& __t) const {
return __t.size();
}
template <__integer_like _Tp, C<_Tp> Sentinel>
constexpr _Tp operator()(_Tp &&__t, Sentinel &&last) const {
return __t;
}
template <template <class> class H, class S, C<H<S>> Sentinel>
constexpr H<S> operator()(H<S> &&__s, Sentinel &&last) const {
return __s;
}
// Tests that we could find different concept definition indeed.
#ifndef DIFFERENT
template <__integer_like _Tp, __integer_like _Up, C<_Tp> Sentinel>
constexpr _Tp operator()(_Tp &&__t, _Up _u, Sentinel &&last) const {
return __t;
}
#else
template <__integer_like _Tp, __integer_like _Up, C<_Up> Sentinel>
constexpr _Tp operator()(_Tp &&__t, _Up _u, Sentinel &&last) const {
return __t;
}
#endif
};
#endif
//--- A.cppm
module;
#include "foo.h"
export module A;
//--- B.cppm
module;
#include "foo.h"
export module B;
import A;
#ifdef SKIP_ODR_CHECK_IN_GMF
// expected-error@B.cppm:* {{call to object of type '__fn' is ambiguous}}
// expected-note@* 1+{{candidate function}}
#elif defined(DIFFERENT)
// expected-error@foo.h:41 {{'__fn::operator()' from module 'A.<global>' is not present in definition of '__fn' provided earlier}}
// expected-note@* 1+{{declaration of 'operator()' does not match}}
#else
// expected-no-diagnostics
#endif
template <class T>
struct U {
auto operator+(U) { return 0; }
};
void foo() {
A a;
struct S {
int size() { return 0; }
auto operator+(S s) { return 0; }
};
__fn{}(S());
__fn{}(S(), S());
__fn{}(S(), S(), S());
__fn{}(U<int>(), U<int>());
}