vasilito
cb424d7448
verify-patch-sanity.py validates every active recipe .patch has internally- consistent hunk line counts — catching the 'malformed patch at line N' failure at commit/CI/preflight time instead of hours into a cook. This cycle hit that class three times (qtwaylandscanner, sddm, xwayland), each only discovered when cookbook tried to apply the patch. Running it across the repo found 29 latent malformed patches (validated against GNU patch: e.g. relibc/P3-sysv-ipc reproduces 'malformed patch at line 22'). They were harmless only because they sit in vendored recipes (baked, not re- applied) — but would fail on any version-bump re-derivation. --fix recounts the hunk headers (body untouched) and repaired all 29. Wired into build-preflight.sh (Phase 1.0D) and redbear-ci.yml, with a unit test (test-patch-sanity.sh). Skips archived/legacy trees and unvalidatable formats (empty placeholders, bare-@@ git hunks).
90 lines
2.6 KiB
C++
90 lines
2.6 KiB
C++
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -emit-llvm %s -o - -triple=i386-pc-win32 | FileCheck %s
|
|
|
|
class C {
|
|
public:
|
|
void simple_method() {}
|
|
|
|
void __cdecl cdecl_method() {}
|
|
|
|
void vararg_method(const char *fmt, ...) {}
|
|
|
|
static void static_method() {}
|
|
|
|
int a;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
void call_simple_method() {
|
|
C instance;
|
|
|
|
instance.simple_method();
|
|
// Make sure that the call uses the right calling convention:
|
|
// CHECK: call x86_thiscallcc void @"?simple_method@C@@QAEXXZ"
|
|
// CHECK: ret
|
|
|
|
// Make sure that the definition uses the right calling convention:
|
|
// CHECK: define linkonce_odr dso_local x86_thiscallcc void @"?simple_method@C@@QAEXXZ"
|
|
// CHECK: ret
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void call_cdecl_method() {
|
|
C instance;
|
|
instance.cdecl_method();
|
|
// Make sure that the call uses the right calling convention:
|
|
// CHECK: call void @"?cdecl_method@C@@QAAXXZ"
|
|
// CHECK: ret
|
|
|
|
// Make sure that the definition uses the right calling convention:
|
|
// CHECK: define linkonce_odr dso_local void @"?cdecl_method@C@@QAAXXZ"
|
|
// CHECK: ret
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void call_vararg_method() {
|
|
C instance;
|
|
instance.vararg_method("Hello");
|
|
// Make sure that the call uses the right calling convention:
|
|
// CHECK: call void (ptr, ptr, ...) @"?vararg_method@C@@QAAXPBDZZ"
|
|
// CHECK: ret
|
|
|
|
// Make sure that the definition uses the right calling convention:
|
|
// CHECK: define linkonce_odr dso_local void @"?vararg_method@C@@QAAXPBDZZ"
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void call_static_method() {
|
|
C::static_method();
|
|
// Make sure that the call uses the right calling convention:
|
|
// CHECK: call void @"?static_method@C@@SAXXZ"
|
|
// CHECK: ret
|
|
|
|
// Make sure that the definition uses the right calling convention:
|
|
// CHECK: define linkonce_odr dso_local void @"?static_method@C@@SAXXZ"
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
class Base {
|
|
public:
|
|
Base() {}
|
|
~Base() {}
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
class Child: public Base { };
|
|
|
|
void constructors() {
|
|
Child c;
|
|
// Make sure that the Base constructor call noundef in the Child constructor uses
|
|
// the right calling convention:
|
|
// CHECK: define linkonce_odr dso_local x86_thiscallcc noundef ptr @"??0Child@@QAE@XZ"
|
|
// CHECK: %{{[.0-9A-Z_a-z]+}} = call x86_thiscallcc noundef ptr @"??0Base@@QAE@XZ"
|
|
// CHECK: ret
|
|
|
|
// Make sure that the Base destructor call noundef in the Child denstructor uses
|
|
// the right calling convention:
|
|
// CHECK: define linkonce_odr dso_local x86_thiscallcc void @"??1Child@@QAE@XZ"
|
|
// CHECK: call x86_thiscallcc void @"??1Base@@QAE@XZ"
|
|
// CHECK: ret
|
|
|
|
// Make sure that the Base constructor definition uses the right CC:
|
|
// CHECK: define linkonce_odr dso_local x86_thiscallcc noundef ptr @"??0Base@@QAE@XZ"
|
|
|
|
// Make sure that the Base destructor definition uses the right CC:
|
|
// CHECK: define linkonce_odr dso_local x86_thiscallcc void @"??1Base@@QAE@XZ"
|
|
}
|