cb424d7448
verify-patch-sanity.py validates every active recipe .patch has internally- consistent hunk line counts — catching the 'malformed patch at line N' failure at commit/CI/preflight time instead of hours into a cook. This cycle hit that class three times (qtwaylandscanner, sddm, xwayland), each only discovered when cookbook tried to apply the patch. Running it across the repo found 29 latent malformed patches (validated against GNU patch: e.g. relibc/P3-sysv-ipc reproduces 'malformed patch at line 22'). They were harmless only because they sit in vendored recipes (baked, not re- applied) — but would fail on any version-bump re-derivation. --fix recounts the hunk headers (body untouched) and repaired all 29. Wired into build-preflight.sh (Phase 1.0D) and redbear-ci.yml, with a unit test (test-patch-sanity.sh). Skips archived/legacy trees and unvalidatable formats (empty placeholders, bare-@@ git hunks).
173 lines
7.5 KiB
C++
173 lines
7.5 KiB
C++
//===--- ASTConcept.cpp - Concepts Related AST Data Structures --*- C++ -*-===//
|
|
//
|
|
// Part of the LLVM Project, under the Apache License v2.0 with LLVM Exceptions.
|
|
// See https://llvm.org/LICENSE.txt for license information.
|
|
// SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception
|
|
//
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
///
|
|
/// \file
|
|
/// \brief This file defines AST data structures related to concepts.
|
|
///
|
|
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
|
|
|
|
#include "clang/AST/ASTConcept.h"
|
|
#include "clang/AST/ASTContext.h"
|
|
#include "clang/AST/ExprConcepts.h"
|
|
#include "clang/AST/PrettyPrinter.h"
|
|
#include "llvm/ADT/StringExtras.h"
|
|
|
|
using namespace clang;
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
CreateUnsatisfiedConstraintRecord(const ASTContext &C,
|
|
const UnsatisfiedConstraintRecord &Detail,
|
|
UnsatisfiedConstraintRecord *TrailingObject) {
|
|
if (auto *E = dyn_cast<Expr *>(Detail))
|
|
new (TrailingObject) UnsatisfiedConstraintRecord(E);
|
|
else {
|
|
auto &SubstitutionDiagnostic =
|
|
*cast<std::pair<SourceLocation, StringRef> *>(Detail);
|
|
StringRef Message = C.backupStr(SubstitutionDiagnostic.second);
|
|
auto *NewSubstDiag = new (C) std::pair<SourceLocation, StringRef>(
|
|
SubstitutionDiagnostic.first, Message);
|
|
new (TrailingObject) UnsatisfiedConstraintRecord(NewSubstDiag);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ASTConstraintSatisfaction::ASTConstraintSatisfaction(
|
|
const ASTContext &C, const ConstraintSatisfaction &Satisfaction)
|
|
: NumRecords{Satisfaction.Details.size()},
|
|
IsSatisfied{Satisfaction.IsSatisfied}, ContainsErrors{
|
|
Satisfaction.ContainsErrors} {
|
|
for (unsigned I = 0; I < NumRecords; ++I)
|
|
CreateUnsatisfiedConstraintRecord(C, Satisfaction.Details[I],
|
|
getTrailingObjects() + I);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ASTConstraintSatisfaction::ASTConstraintSatisfaction(
|
|
const ASTContext &C, const ASTConstraintSatisfaction &Satisfaction)
|
|
: NumRecords{Satisfaction.NumRecords},
|
|
IsSatisfied{Satisfaction.IsSatisfied},
|
|
ContainsErrors{Satisfaction.ContainsErrors} {
|
|
for (unsigned I = 0; I < NumRecords; ++I)
|
|
CreateUnsatisfiedConstraintRecord(C, *(Satisfaction.begin() + I),
|
|
getTrailingObjects() + I);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ASTConstraintSatisfaction *
|
|
ASTConstraintSatisfaction::Create(const ASTContext &C,
|
|
const ConstraintSatisfaction &Satisfaction) {
|
|
std::size_t size =
|
|
totalSizeToAlloc<UnsatisfiedConstraintRecord>(
|
|
Satisfaction.Details.size());
|
|
void *Mem = C.Allocate(size, alignof(ASTConstraintSatisfaction));
|
|
return new (Mem) ASTConstraintSatisfaction(C, Satisfaction);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ASTConstraintSatisfaction *ASTConstraintSatisfaction::Rebuild(
|
|
const ASTContext &C, const ASTConstraintSatisfaction &Satisfaction) {
|
|
std::size_t size =
|
|
totalSizeToAlloc<UnsatisfiedConstraintRecord>(Satisfaction.NumRecords);
|
|
void *Mem = C.Allocate(size, alignof(ASTConstraintSatisfaction));
|
|
return new (Mem) ASTConstraintSatisfaction(C, Satisfaction);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void ConstraintSatisfaction::Profile(
|
|
llvm::FoldingSetNodeID &ID, const ASTContext &C,
|
|
const NamedDecl *ConstraintOwner, ArrayRef<TemplateArgument> TemplateArgs) {
|
|
ID.AddPointer(ConstraintOwner);
|
|
ID.AddInteger(TemplateArgs.size());
|
|
for (auto &Arg : TemplateArgs)
|
|
Arg.Profile(ID, C);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
ConceptReference *
|
|
ConceptReference::Create(const ASTContext &C, NestedNameSpecifierLoc NNS,
|
|
SourceLocation TemplateKWLoc,
|
|
DeclarationNameInfo ConceptNameInfo,
|
|
NamedDecl *FoundDecl, ConceptDecl *NamedConcept,
|
|
const ASTTemplateArgumentListInfo *ArgsAsWritten) {
|
|
return new (C) ConceptReference(NNS, TemplateKWLoc, ConceptNameInfo,
|
|
FoundDecl, NamedConcept, ArgsAsWritten);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void ConceptReference::print(llvm::raw_ostream &OS,
|
|
const PrintingPolicy &Policy) const {
|
|
if (NestedNameSpec)
|
|
NestedNameSpec.getNestedNameSpecifier()->print(OS, Policy);
|
|
ConceptName.printName(OS, Policy);
|
|
if (hasExplicitTemplateArgs()) {
|
|
OS << "<";
|
|
llvm::ListSeparator Sep(", ");
|
|
// FIXME: Find corresponding parameter for argument
|
|
for (auto &ArgLoc : ArgsAsWritten->arguments()) {
|
|
OS << Sep;
|
|
ArgLoc.getArgument().print(Policy, OS, /*IncludeType*/ false);
|
|
}
|
|
OS << ">";
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
concepts::ExprRequirement::ExprRequirement(
|
|
Expr *E, bool IsSimple, SourceLocation NoexceptLoc,
|
|
ReturnTypeRequirement Req, SatisfactionStatus Status,
|
|
ConceptSpecializationExpr *SubstitutedConstraintExpr)
|
|
: Requirement(IsSimple ? RK_Simple : RK_Compound, Status == SS_Dependent,
|
|
Status == SS_Dependent &&
|
|
(E->containsUnexpandedParameterPack() ||
|
|
Req.containsUnexpandedParameterPack()),
|
|
Status == SS_Satisfied),
|
|
Value(E), NoexceptLoc(NoexceptLoc), TypeReq(Req),
|
|
SubstitutedConstraintExpr(SubstitutedConstraintExpr), Status(Status) {
|
|
assert((!IsSimple || (Req.isEmpty() && NoexceptLoc.isInvalid())) &&
|
|
"Simple requirement must not have a return type requirement or a "
|
|
"noexcept specification");
|
|
assert((Status > SS_TypeRequirementSubstitutionFailure &&
|
|
Req.isTypeConstraint()) == (SubstitutedConstraintExpr != nullptr));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
concepts::ExprRequirement::ExprRequirement(
|
|
SubstitutionDiagnostic *ExprSubstDiag, bool IsSimple,
|
|
SourceLocation NoexceptLoc, ReturnTypeRequirement Req)
|
|
: Requirement(IsSimple ? RK_Simple : RK_Compound, Req.isDependent(),
|
|
Req.containsUnexpandedParameterPack(), /*IsSatisfied=*/false),
|
|
Value(ExprSubstDiag), NoexceptLoc(NoexceptLoc), TypeReq(Req),
|
|
Status(SS_ExprSubstitutionFailure) {
|
|
assert((!IsSimple || (Req.isEmpty() && NoexceptLoc.isInvalid())) &&
|
|
"Simple requirement must not have a return type requirement or a "
|
|
"noexcept specification");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
concepts::ExprRequirement::ReturnTypeRequirement::ReturnTypeRequirement(
|
|
TemplateParameterList *TPL)
|
|
: TypeConstraintInfo(TPL, false) {
|
|
assert(TPL->size() == 1);
|
|
const TypeConstraint *TC =
|
|
cast<TemplateTypeParmDecl>(TPL->getParam(0))->getTypeConstraint();
|
|
assert(TC &&
|
|
"TPL must have a template type parameter with a type constraint");
|
|
auto *Constraint =
|
|
cast<ConceptSpecializationExpr>(TC->getImmediatelyDeclaredConstraint());
|
|
bool Dependent =
|
|
Constraint->getTemplateArgsAsWritten() &&
|
|
TemplateSpecializationType::anyInstantiationDependentTemplateArguments(
|
|
Constraint->getTemplateArgsAsWritten()->arguments().drop_front(1));
|
|
TypeConstraintInfo.setInt(Dependent ? true : false);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
concepts::ExprRequirement::ReturnTypeRequirement::ReturnTypeRequirement(
|
|
TemplateParameterList *TPL, bool IsDependent)
|
|
: TypeConstraintInfo(TPL, IsDependent) {}
|
|
|
|
concepts::TypeRequirement::TypeRequirement(TypeSourceInfo *T)
|
|
: Requirement(RK_Type, T->getType()->isInstantiationDependentType(),
|
|
T->getType()->containsUnexpandedParameterPack(),
|
|
// We reach this ctor with either dependent types (in which
|
|
// IsSatisfied doesn't matter) or with non-dependent type in
|
|
// which the existence of the type indicates satisfaction.
|
|
/*IsSatisfied=*/true),
|
|
Value(T),
|
|
Status(T->getType()->isInstantiationDependentType() ? SS_Dependent
|
|
: SS_Satisfied) {}
|