vasilito
cb424d7448
verify-patch-sanity.py validates every active recipe .patch has internally- consistent hunk line counts — catching the 'malformed patch at line N' failure at commit/CI/preflight time instead of hours into a cook. This cycle hit that class three times (qtwaylandscanner, sddm, xwayland), each only discovered when cookbook tried to apply the patch. Running it across the repo found 29 latent malformed patches (validated against GNU patch: e.g. relibc/P3-sysv-ipc reproduces 'malformed patch at line 22'). They were harmless only because they sit in vendored recipes (baked, not re- applied) — but would fail on any version-bump re-derivation. --fix recounts the hunk headers (body untouched) and repaired all 29. Wired into build-preflight.sh (Phase 1.0D) and redbear-ci.yml, with a unit test (test-patch-sanity.sh). Skips archived/legacy trees and unvalidatable formats (empty placeholders, bare-@@ git hunks).
117 lines
2.7 KiB
C++
117 lines
2.7 KiB
C++
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify -std=c++11 %s
|
|
|
|
struct x {
|
|
x() : a(4) ; // expected-error {{expected '{'}}
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
struct y {
|
|
int a;
|
|
y() : a(4) ; // expected-error {{expected '{'}}
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
struct z {
|
|
int a;
|
|
z() : a {}
|
|
}; // expected-error {{expected '{'}}
|
|
|
|
namespace PR16480 {
|
|
template<int n> struct X {
|
|
X();
|
|
X(int);
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
struct A : X<0> {
|
|
A() : X<a<b>{0}.n>() {}
|
|
|
|
template<int> struct a {
|
|
int n;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
static const int b = 1;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
struct B : X<0> {
|
|
B() : X<a<b>{0} {}
|
|
|
|
static const int a = 0, b = 0;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
template<int> struct a {
|
|
constexpr a(int) {}
|
|
constexpr operator int() const { return 0; }
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
struct C : X<0> {
|
|
C() : X<a<b>(0)>() {}
|
|
|
|
static const int b = 0;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
struct D : X<0> {
|
|
D() : X<a<b>(0) {}
|
|
|
|
static const int a = 0, b = 0;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
template<typename T> struct E : X<0> {
|
|
E(X<0>) : X<(0)>{} {}
|
|
E(X<1>) : X<int{}>{} {}
|
|
E(X<2>) : X<(0)>() {}
|
|
E(X<3>) : X<int{}>() {}
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
// FIXME: This should be valid in the union of C99 and C++11.
|
|
struct F : X<0> {
|
|
F() : X<A<T>().n + (T){}.n>{} {} // expected-error +{{}} expected-note {{to match}}
|
|
|
|
struct T { int n; };
|
|
template<typename> struct A { int n; };
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
// FIXME: This is valid now, but may be made ill-formed by DR1607.
|
|
struct G : X<0> {
|
|
G() : X<0 && [](){return 0;}()>{} // expected-error +{{}} expected-note {{to match}}
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
struct Errs : X<0> {
|
|
Errs(X<0>) : decltype X<0>() {} // expected-error {{expected '(' after 'decltype'}}
|
|
Errs(X<1>) : what is this () {} // expected-error {{expected '(' or '{'}}
|
|
Errs(X<2>) : decltype(X<0> // expected-note {{to match this '('}}
|
|
}; // expected-error {{expected ')'}}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
template <class U, class V> struct C {
|
|
int f() { return 4; }
|
|
class C1 {};
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
class D {};
|
|
namespace N {
|
|
struct E {
|
|
class F {};
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
class G {
|
|
// These are all valid:
|
|
void f(int x = C<int, D>().f()) {}
|
|
void g(int x = C<int, ::D>().f()) {}
|
|
void h(int x = C<int, N::E>().f()) {}
|
|
void i(int x = C<int, ::N::E>().f()) {}
|
|
void j(int x = C<int, decltype(N::E())::F>().f()) {}
|
|
void k(int x = C<int, C<int, int>>().f()) {}
|
|
void l(int x = C<int, C<int, int>::C1>().f()) {}
|
|
|
|
// This isn't, but it shouldn't crash. The diagnostics don't matter much.
|
|
void m(int x = C<int, union int>().f()) {}
|
|
// expected-error@-1 {{declaration of anonymous union must be a definition}}
|
|
// expected-error@-2 {{type name requires a specifier or qualifier}}
|
|
// expected-error@-3 {{expected '>'}}
|
|
// expected-note@-4 {{to match this '<'}}
|
|
|
|
void n(int x = 1 ? 2) {}
|
|
// expected-error@-1 {{expected ':'}}
|
|
// expected-note@-2 {{to match this '?'}}
|
|
// expected-error@-3 {{expected expression}}
|
|
};
|