vasilito
cb424d7448
verify-patch-sanity.py validates every active recipe .patch has internally- consistent hunk line counts — catching the 'malformed patch at line N' failure at commit/CI/preflight time instead of hours into a cook. This cycle hit that class three times (qtwaylandscanner, sddm, xwayland), each only discovered when cookbook tried to apply the patch. Running it across the repo found 29 latent malformed patches (validated against GNU patch: e.g. relibc/P3-sysv-ipc reproduces 'malformed patch at line 22'). They were harmless only because they sit in vendored recipes (baked, not re- applied) — but would fail on any version-bump re-derivation. --fix recounts the hunk headers (body untouched) and repaired all 29. Wired into build-preflight.sh (Phase 1.0D) and redbear-ci.yml, with a unit test (test-patch-sanity.sh). Skips archived/legacy trees and unvalidatable formats (empty placeholders, bare-@@ git hunks).
53 lines
2.4 KiB
C++
53 lines
2.4 KiB
C++
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -verify %s
|
|
|
|
// Check that "::new" and "::delete" in member initializer list are diagnosed
|
|
// correctly and don't lead to infinite loop on parsing.
|
|
|
|
// Error: X() (initializer on non-constructor), "::new" is skipped.
|
|
void f1() : X() ::new{}; // expected-error{{only constructors take base initializers}}
|
|
|
|
// Errors: first "::delete" and initializer on non-constructor, others skipped.
|
|
void f2() : ::delete, ::new, X() ::new ::delete{} // expected-error{{expected class member or base class name}}
|
|
// expected-error@-1{{only constructors take base initializers}}
|
|
|
|
// Errors: the '::' token, "::delete" and initializer on non-constructor, others skipped.
|
|
void f3() : ::, ::delete X(), ::new {}; // expected-error2{{expected class member or base class name}}
|
|
// expected-error@-1{{only constructors take base initializers}}
|
|
|
|
template <class T>
|
|
struct Base1 {
|
|
T x1;
|
|
Base1(T a1) : x1(a1) {}
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
template <class T>
|
|
struct Base2 {
|
|
T x2;
|
|
Base2(T a2) : x2(a2) {}
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
struct S : public Base1<int>, public Base2<float> {
|
|
int x;
|
|
|
|
// 1-st initializer is correct (just missing ','), 2-nd incorrect, skip other.
|
|
S() : ::Base1<int>(0) ::new, ::Base2<float>(1.0) ::delete x(2) {} // expected-error{{expected class member or base class name}}
|
|
// expected-error@-1{{missing ',' between base or member initializers}}
|
|
|
|
// 1-st and 2-nd are correct, errors: '::' and "::new", others skipped.
|
|
S(int a) : Base1<int>(a), ::Base2<float>(1.0), ::, // expected-error{{expected class member or base class name}}
|
|
::new, ! ::delete, ::Base2<() x(3) {} // expected-error{{expected class member or base class name}}
|
|
|
|
// All initializers are correct, nothing to skip, diagnose 2 missing commas.
|
|
S(const S &) : Base1<int>(0) ::Base2<float>(1.0) x(2) {} // expected-error2{{missing ',' between base or member initializers}}
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
namespace GH113722 {
|
|
struct S {
|
|
void m(int x = 0; // expected-error {{unexpected end of default argument expression}} \
|
|
expected-note {{to match this '('}}
|
|
#pragma unused(x) // expected-error {{expected ')'}} \
|
|
expected-error {{expected ';' at end of declaration list}}
|
|
} // expected-error {{expected ';' after struct}}
|
|
};
|
|
} // expected-error {{extraneous closing brace ('}')}}
|