Files
RedBear-OS/local/recipes/dev/libclc/source/clang/test/Modules/merge-concepts.cppm
T
vasilito cb424d7448 build: static patch-sanity linter (shift-left the malformed-patch class)
verify-patch-sanity.py validates every active recipe .patch has internally-
consistent hunk line counts — catching the 'malformed patch at line N' failure
at commit/CI/preflight time instead of hours into a cook. This cycle hit that
class three times (qtwaylandscanner, sddm, xwayland), each only discovered when
cookbook tried to apply the patch.

Running it across the repo found 29 latent malformed patches (validated against
GNU patch: e.g. relibc/P3-sysv-ipc reproduces 'malformed patch at line 22').
They were harmless only because they sit in vendored recipes (baked, not re-
applied) — but would fail on any version-bump re-derivation. --fix recounts the
hunk headers (body untouched) and repaired all 29.

Wired into build-preflight.sh (Phase 1.0D) and redbear-ci.yml, with a unit test
(test-patch-sanity.sh). Skips archived/legacy trees and unvalidatable formats
(empty placeholders, bare-@@ git hunks).
2026-08-01 05:13:02 +03:00

184 lines
4.8 KiB
C++

// RUN: rm -rf %t
// RUN: mkdir %t
// RUN: split-file %s %t
//
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 -emit-module-interface -I%t %t/A.cppm -o %t/A.pcm
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 -emit-module-interface -I%t %t/B.cppm -o %t/B.pcm
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 -fprebuilt-module-path=%t %t/Use.cpp -verify -fsyntax-only
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 -fprebuilt-module-path=%t %t/Use2.cpp -verify -fsyntax-only
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 -fprebuilt-module-path=%t %t/Use3.cpp -verify -fsyntax-only
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 -fprebuilt-module-path=%t %t/Use4.cpp -verify -fsyntax-only
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 -fprebuilt-module-path=%t %t/C.cppm -verify -fsyntax-only
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 -I%t %t/D.cppm -verify -fsyntax-only
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 -I%t %t/E.cppm -verify -fsyntax-only
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 -I%t %t/F.cppm -verify -fsyntax-only
//
// Testing header units for coverity.
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 -emit-header-unit -xc++-user-header %t/foo.h -o %t/foo.pcm
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 -fprebuilt-module-path=%t -fmodule-file=%t/foo.pcm %t/Use5.cpp -verify -fsyntax-only
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 -fprebuilt-module-path=%t -fmodule-file=%t/foo.pcm %t/Use6.cpp -verify -fsyntax-only
//
// Testing with module map modules. It is unclear about the relation ship between Clang modules and
// C++20 Named Modules. Will they coexist? Or will they be mutually exclusive?
// The test here is for primarily coverity.
//
// RUN: rm -f %t/foo.pcm
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 -fmodules -fmodules-cache-path=%t -fprebuilt-module-path=%t \
// RUN: -fmodule-map-file=%t/module.modulemap %t/Use7.cpp -verify -fsyntax-only
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 -fmodules -fmodules-cache-path=%t -fprebuilt-module-path=%t \
// RUN: -fmodule-map-file=%t/module.modulemap %t/Use7.cpp -verify -fsyntax-only
// Testing module map modules with named modules.
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 -fmodules -fmodules-cache-path=%t -fmodule-map-file=%t/module.modulemap \
// RUN: %t/A.cppm -o %t/A.pcm
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 -fmodules -fmodules-cache-path=%t -fprebuilt-module-path=%t \
// RUN: -fmodule-map-file=%t/module.modulemap %t/Use7.cpp -verify -fsyntax-only
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 -fmodules -fmodules-cache-path=%t -fprebuilt-module-path=%t \
// RUN: -fmodule-map-file=%t/module.modulemap %t/Use7.cpp -verify -fsyntax-only
//
//--- foo.h
#ifndef FOO_H
#define FOO_H
template <class T, class U>
concept same_as = __is_same(T, U);
#endif
// The compiler would warn if we include foo_h twice without guard.
//--- redecl.h
#ifndef REDECL_H
#define REDECL_H
template <class T, class U>
concept same_as = __is_same(T, U);
#endif
//--- A.cppm
module;
#include "foo.h"
export module A;
export using ::same_as;
//--- B.cppm
module;
#include "foo.h"
export module B;
export using ::same_as;
//--- Use.cpp
// expected-no-diagnostics
import A;
import B;
template <class T> void foo()
requires same_as<T, int>
{}
//--- Use2.cpp
// expected-no-diagnostics
#include "foo.h"
import A;
template <class T> void foo()
requires same_as<T, int>
{}
//--- Use3.cpp
// expected-no-diagnostics
import A;
#include "foo.h"
template <class T> void foo()
requires same_as<T, int>
{}
//--- Use4.cpp
// expected-no-diagnostics
import A;
import B;
#include "foo.h"
template <class T> void foo()
requires same_as<T, int>
{}
//--- C.cppm
// expected-no-diagnostics
module;
#include "foo.h"
export module C;
import A;
import B;
template <class T> void foo()
requires same_as<T, int>
{}
//--- D.cppm
module;
#include "foo.h"
#include "redecl.h"
export module D;
export using ::same_as;
// expected-error@* {{redefinition of 'same_as'}}
// expected-note@* 1+{{previous definition is here}}
//--- E.cppm
module;
#include "foo.h"
export module E;
export template <class T, class U>
concept same_as = __is_same(T, U);
// expected-error@* {{redefinition of 'same_as'}}
// expected-note@* 1+{{previous definition is here}}
//--- F.cppm
export module F;
template <class T, class U>
concept same_as = __is_same(T, U);
template <class T, class U>
concept same_as = __is_same(T, U);
// expected-error@* {{redefinition of 'same_as'}}
// expected-note@* 1+{{previous definition is here}}
//--- Use5.cpp
import "foo.h"; // expected-warning {{the implementation of header units is in an experimental phase}}
import A;
template <class T> void foo()
requires same_as<T, int>
{}
//--- Use6.cpp
import A;
import "foo.h"; // expected-warning {{the implementation of header units is in an experimental phase}}
template <class T> void foo()
requires same_as<T, int>
{}
//--- module.modulemap
module "foo" {
export *
header "foo.h"
}
//--- Use7.cpp
// expected-no-diagnostics
#include "foo.h"
import A;
template <class T> void foo()
requires same_as<T, int>
{}
//--- Use8.cpp
// expected-no-diagnostics
import A;
#include "foo.h"
template <class T> void foo()
requires same_as<T, int>
{}