vasilito
cb424d7448
verify-patch-sanity.py validates every active recipe .patch has internally- consistent hunk line counts — catching the 'malformed patch at line N' failure at commit/CI/preflight time instead of hours into a cook. This cycle hit that class three times (qtwaylandscanner, sddm, xwayland), each only discovered when cookbook tried to apply the patch. Running it across the repo found 29 latent malformed patches (validated against GNU patch: e.g. relibc/P3-sysv-ipc reproduces 'malformed patch at line 22'). They were harmless only because they sit in vendored recipes (baked, not re- applied) — but would fail on any version-bump re-derivation. --fix recounts the hunk headers (body untouched) and repaired all 29. Wired into build-preflight.sh (Phase 1.0D) and redbear-ci.yml, with a unit test (test-patch-sanity.sh). Skips archived/legacy trees and unvalidatable formats (empty placeholders, bare-@@ git hunks).
48 lines
1.8 KiB
C++
48 lines
1.8 KiB
C++
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -fsyntax-only -triple armv7k-apple-darwin-watchos -fdump-record-layouts %s | FileCheck %s
|
|
|
|
// WatchOS, 64-bit iOS, and WebAssembly use the C++11 definition of POD to
|
|
// determine whether we can reuse the tail padding of a struct (POD is
|
|
// "trivially copyable and standard layout"). The definition of standard
|
|
// layout changed some time around C++17; check that we still use the old
|
|
// ABI rule.
|
|
|
|
// B is not standard-layout, but it was under C++11's rule, so we pack
|
|
// C::d into its tail padding anyway.
|
|
struct A { int : 0; };
|
|
struct B : A { int n; char c[3]; };
|
|
struct C : B { char d; };
|
|
int c = sizeof(C);
|
|
static_assert(!__is_standard_layout(B));
|
|
|
|
// CHECK:*** Dumping AST Record Layout
|
|
// CHECK: 0 | struct C
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | struct B (base)
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | struct A (base) (empty)
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 0:- | int
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | int n
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 4 | char[3] c
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 8 | char d
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: | [sizeof=12, dsize=9, align=4,
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: | nvsize=9, nvalign=4]
|
|
|
|
// F is not standard-layout due to the repeated D base class, but it was under
|
|
// C++11's rule, so we pack G::d into its tail padding anyway.
|
|
struct D {};
|
|
struct E : D {};
|
|
struct F : D, E { int n; char c[3]; };
|
|
struct G : F { G(const G&); char d; };
|
|
int g = sizeof(G);
|
|
static_assert(!__is_standard_layout(F));
|
|
|
|
// CHECK:*** Dumping AST Record Layout
|
|
// CHECK: 0 | struct G
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | struct F (base)
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | struct D (base) (empty)
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 1 | struct E (base) (empty)
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 1 | struct D (base) (empty)
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 0 | int n
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 4 | char[3] c
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: 8 | char d
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: | [sizeof=12, dsize=9, align=4,
|
|
// CHECK-NEXT: | nvsize=9, nvalign=4]
|