cb424d7448
verify-patch-sanity.py validates every active recipe .patch has internally- consistent hunk line counts — catching the 'malformed patch at line N' failure at commit/CI/preflight time instead of hours into a cook. This cycle hit that class three times (qtwaylandscanner, sddm, xwayland), each only discovered when cookbook tried to apply the patch. Running it across the repo found 29 latent malformed patches (validated against GNU patch: e.g. relibc/P3-sysv-ipc reproduces 'malformed patch at line 22'). They were harmless only because they sit in vendored recipes (baked, not re- applied) — but would fail on any version-bump re-derivation. --fix recounts the hunk headers (body untouched) and repaired all 29. Wired into build-preflight.sh (Phase 1.0D) and redbear-ci.yml, with a unit test (test-patch-sanity.sh). Skips archived/legacy trees and unvalidatable formats (empty placeholders, bare-@@ git hunks).
96 lines
1.9 KiB
C++
96 lines
1.9 KiB
C++
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++98 -emit-llvm %s -o - -triple=x86_64-apple-darwin10 | FileCheck %s
|
|
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 -emit-llvm %s -o - -triple=x86_64-apple-darwin10 | FileCheck %s
|
|
|
|
struct S {
|
|
virtual ~S() { }
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
// PR5706
|
|
// Make sure this doesn't crash; the mangling doesn't matter because the name
|
|
// doesn't have linkage.
|
|
static struct : S { } obj8;
|
|
|
|
void f() {
|
|
// Make sure this doesn't crash; the mangling doesn't matter because the
|
|
// generated vtable/etc. aren't modifiable (although it would be nice for
|
|
// codesize to make it consistent inside inline functions).
|
|
static struct : S { } obj8;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
inline int f2() {
|
|
// FIXME: We don't mangle the names of a or x correctly!
|
|
static struct { int a() { static int x; return ++x; } } obj;
|
|
return obj.a();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
int f3() { return f2(); }
|
|
|
|
struct A {
|
|
typedef struct { int x; } *ptr;
|
|
ptr m;
|
|
int a() {
|
|
static struct x {
|
|
// FIXME: We don't mangle the names of a or x correctly!
|
|
int a(ptr A::*memp) { static int x; return ++x; }
|
|
} a;
|
|
return a.a(&A::m);
|
|
}
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
int f4() { return A().a(); }
|
|
|
|
int f5() {
|
|
static union {
|
|
int a;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: _ZZ2f5vE1a
|
|
return a;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
#if __cplusplus <= 199711L
|
|
int f6() {
|
|
static union {
|
|
union {
|
|
int : 1;
|
|
};
|
|
int b;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
// CXX98: _ZZ2f6vE1b
|
|
return b;
|
|
}
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
int f7() {
|
|
static union {
|
|
union {
|
|
int b;
|
|
} a;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
// CHECK: _ZZ2f7vE1a
|
|
return a.b;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// This used to cause an assert because the typedef-for-anonymous-tag
|
|
// code was trying to claim the enum for the template.
|
|
enum { T8 };
|
|
template <class T> struct Test8 {
|
|
typedef T type;
|
|
Test8(type t) {} // tested later
|
|
};
|
|
template <class T> void make_test8(T value) { Test8<T> t(value); }
|
|
void test8() { make_test8(T8); }
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-LABEL: define internal void @"_ZNV3$_35test9Ev"(
|
|
typedef volatile struct {
|
|
void test9() volatile {}
|
|
} Test9;
|
|
void test9() {
|
|
Test9 a;
|
|
a.test9();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
// CHECK-LABEL: define internal void @"_ZN5Test8I3$_2EC1ES0_"(
|