cb424d7448
verify-patch-sanity.py validates every active recipe .patch has internally- consistent hunk line counts — catching the 'malformed patch at line N' failure at commit/CI/preflight time instead of hours into a cook. This cycle hit that class three times (qtwaylandscanner, sddm, xwayland), each only discovered when cookbook tried to apply the patch. Running it across the repo found 29 latent malformed patches (validated against GNU patch: e.g. relibc/P3-sysv-ipc reproduces 'malformed patch at line 22'). They were harmless only because they sit in vendored recipes (baked, not re- applied) — but would fail on any version-bump re-derivation. --fix recounts the hunk headers (body untouched) and repaired all 29. Wired into build-preflight.sh (Phase 1.0D) and redbear-ci.yml, with a unit test (test-patch-sanity.sh). Skips archived/legacy trees and unvalidatable formats (empty placeholders, bare-@@ git hunks).
35 lines
1.8 KiB
C++
35 lines
1.8 KiB
C++
// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -analyzer-checker=optin.mpi.MPI-Checker -analyzer-output=text -verify %s
|
|
|
|
// MPI-Checker test file to test note diagnostics.
|
|
|
|
#include "MPIMock.h"
|
|
|
|
void doubleNonblocking() {
|
|
double buf = 0;
|
|
MPI_Request sendReq;
|
|
MPI_Isend(&buf, 1, MPI_DOUBLE, 0, 0, MPI_COMM_WORLD, &sendReq); // expected-note{{Request is previously used by nonblocking call here.}}
|
|
MPI_Irecv(&buf, 1, MPI_DOUBLE, 0, 0, MPI_COMM_WORLD, &sendReq); // expected-warning{{Double nonblocking on request 'sendReq'.}} expected-note{{Double nonblocking on request 'sendReq'.}}
|
|
MPI_Wait(&sendReq, MPI_STATUS_IGNORE);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void missingWait() {
|
|
double buf = 0;
|
|
MPI_Request sendReq;
|
|
MPI_Ireduce(MPI_IN_PLACE, &buf, 1, MPI_DOUBLE, MPI_SUM, 0, MPI_COMM_WORLD, &sendReq); // expected-note{{Request is previously used by nonblocking call here.}}
|
|
} // expected-warning{{Request 'sendReq' has no matching wait.}} expected-note{{Request 'sendReq' has no matching wait.}}
|
|
|
|
// If more than 2 nonblocking calls are using a request in a sequence, they all
|
|
// point to the first call as the 'previous' call. This is because the
|
|
// BugReporterVisitor only checks for differences in state or existence of an
|
|
// entity.
|
|
void tripleNonblocking() {
|
|
double buf = 0;
|
|
MPI_Request sendReq;
|
|
MPI_Isend(&buf, 1, MPI_DOUBLE, 0, 0, MPI_COMM_WORLD, &sendReq); // expected-note 2{{Request is previously used by nonblocking call here.}}
|
|
MPI_Irecv(&buf, 1, MPI_DOUBLE, 0, 0, MPI_COMM_WORLD, &sendReq); // expected-warning{{Double nonblocking on request 'sendReq'.}} expected-note{{Double nonblocking on request 'sendReq'.}}
|
|
|
|
MPI_Isend(&buf, 1, MPI_DOUBLE, 0, 0, MPI_COMM_WORLD, &sendReq); // expected-warning{{Double nonblocking on request 'sendReq'.}} expected-note{{Double nonblocking on request 'sendReq'.}}
|
|
|
|
MPI_Wait(&sendReq, MPI_STATUS_IGNORE);
|
|
}
|