Files
RedBear-OS/local/recipes/dev/libclc/source/clang/test/Sema/generic-selection.c
T
vasilito cb424d7448 build: static patch-sanity linter (shift-left the malformed-patch class)
verify-patch-sanity.py validates every active recipe .patch has internally-
consistent hunk line counts — catching the 'malformed patch at line N' failure
at commit/CI/preflight time instead of hours into a cook. This cycle hit that
class three times (qtwaylandscanner, sddm, xwayland), each only discovered when
cookbook tried to apply the patch.

Running it across the repo found 29 latent malformed patches (validated against
GNU patch: e.g. relibc/P3-sysv-ipc reproduces 'malformed patch at line 22').
They were harmless only because they sit in vendored recipes (baked, not re-
applied) — but would fail on any version-bump re-derivation. --fix recounts the
hunk headers (body untouched) and repaired all 29.

Wired into build-preflight.sh (Phase 1.0D) and redbear-ci.yml, with a unit test
(test-patch-sanity.sh). Skips archived/legacy trees and unvalidatable formats
(empty placeholders, bare-@@ git hunks).
2026-08-01 05:13:02 +03:00

89 lines
5.1 KiB
C

// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c11 -fsyntax-only -Wno-strict-prototypes -Wno-implicit-function-declaration -verify %s
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c99 -pedantic -fsyntax-only -Wno-strict-prototypes -Wno-implicit-function-declaration -verify=expected,ext %s
void g(void);
void foo(int n) {
(void) _Generic(0, // ext-warning {{'_Generic' is a C11 extension}}
struct A: 0, // ext-warning {{incomplete type 'struct A' in a '_Generic' association is a C2y extension}}
void(): 0, // expected-error {{type 'void ()' in generic association not an object type}}
int[n]: 0); // expected-error {{type 'int[n]' in generic association is a variably modified type}}
(void) _Generic(0, // ext-warning {{'_Generic' is a C11 extension}}
void (*)(): 0, // expected-note {{compatible type 'void (*)()' specified here}}
void (*)(void): 0); // expected-error {{type 'void (*)(void)' in generic association compatible with previously specified type 'void (*)()'}}
(void) _Generic((void (*)()) 0, // expected-error {{controlling expression type 'void (*)()' compatible with 2 generic association types}} \
// ext-warning {{'_Generic' is a C11 extension}}
void (*)(int): 0, // expected-note {{compatible type 'void (*)(int)' specified here}}
void (*)(void): 0); // expected-note {{compatible type 'void (*)(void)' specified here}}
(void) _Generic(0, // expected-error {{controlling expression type 'int' not compatible with any generic association type}} \
// ext-warning {{'_Generic' is a C11 extension}}
char: 0, short: 0, long: 0);
int a1[_Generic(0, int: 1, short: 2, float: 3, default: 4) == 1 ? 1 : -1]; // ext-warning {{'_Generic' is a C11 extension}}
int a2[_Generic(0, default: 1, short: 2, float: 3, int: 4) == 4 ? 1 : -1]; // ext-warning {{'_Generic' is a C11 extension}}
int a3[_Generic(0L, int: 1, short: 2, float: 3, default: 4) == 4 ? 1 : -1]; // ext-warning {{'_Generic' is a C11 extension}}
int a4[_Generic(0L, default: 1, short: 2, float: 3, int: 4) == 1 ? 1 : -1]; // ext-warning {{'_Generic' is a C11 extension}}
int a5[_Generic(0, int: 1, short: 2, float: 3) == 1 ? 1 : -1]; // ext-warning {{'_Generic' is a C11 extension}}
int a6[_Generic(0, short: 1, float: 2, int: 3) == 3 ? 1 : -1]; // ext-warning {{'_Generic' is a C11 extension}}
int a7[_Generic("test", char *: 1, default: 2) == 1 ? 1 : -1]; // ext-warning {{'_Generic' is a C11 extension}}
int a8[_Generic(g, void (*)(void): 1, default: 2) == 1 ? 1 : -1]; // ext-warning {{'_Generic' is a C11 extension}}
const int i = 12;
int a9[_Generic(i, int: 1, default: 2) == 1 ? 1 : -1]; // ext-warning {{'_Generic' is a C11 extension}}
// This is expected to not trigger any diagnostics because the controlling
// expression is not evaluated.
(void)_Generic(*(int *)0, int: 1); // ext-warning {{'_Generic' is a C11 extension}}
}
int __attribute__((overloadable)) test (int);
double __attribute__((overloadable)) test (double);
char testc(char);
void PR30201(void) {
_Generic(4, char:testc, default:test)(4); // ext-warning {{'_Generic' is a C11 extension}}
}
void GH50227(void) {
// Previously, the controlling expression for the outer _Generic makes it
// result dependent, and testing whether that controlling expression has side
// effects would cause a crash.
_Generic( // ext-warning {{'_Generic' is a C11 extension}}
n(
_Generic(n++, int : 0) // expected-error {{cannot increment value of type 'int ()'}} ext-warning {{'_Generic' is a C11 extension}}
), int : 0);
}
struct Test {
int i;
};
void unreachable_associations(const int i, const struct Test t) {
_Static_assert( // ext-warning {{'_Static_assert' is a C11 extension}}
_Generic(i, // ext-warning {{'_Generic' is a C11 extension}}
const int : 1, // expected-warning {{due to lvalue conversion of the controlling expression, association of type 'const int' will never be selected because it is qualified}}
volatile int : 2, // expected-warning {{due to lvalue conversion of the controlling expression, association of type 'volatile int' will never be selected because it is qualified}}
int[12] : 3, // expected-warning {{due to lvalue conversion of the controlling expression, association of type 'int[12]' will never be selected because it is of array type}}
int : 4,
default : 5
) == 4, "we had better pick int!");
_Static_assert( // ext-warning {{'_Static_assert' is a C11 extension}}
_Generic(t, // ext-warning {{'_Generic' is a C11 extension}}
struct Test : 1,
const struct Test : 2, // expected-warning {{due to lvalue conversion of the controlling expression, association of type 'const struct Test' will never be selected because it is qualified}}
default : 3
) == 1, "we had better pick struct Test, not const struct Test!"); // C-specific result
}
void GH55562(void) {
// Ensure that you can still define a type within a generic selection
// association (despite it not being particularly useful).
(void)_Generic(1, struct S { int a; } : 0, default : 0); // ext-warning {{'_Generic' is a C11 extension}}
struct S s = { 0 };
int i = s.a;
}