cb424d7448
verify-patch-sanity.py validates every active recipe .patch has internally- consistent hunk line counts — catching the 'malformed patch at line N' failure at commit/CI/preflight time instead of hours into a cook. This cycle hit that class three times (qtwaylandscanner, sddm, xwayland), each only discovered when cookbook tried to apply the patch. Running it across the repo found 29 latent malformed patches (validated against GNU patch: e.g. relibc/P3-sysv-ipc reproduces 'malformed patch at line 22'). They were harmless only because they sit in vendored recipes (baked, not re- applied) — but would fail on any version-bump re-derivation. --fix recounts the hunk headers (body untouched) and repaired all 29. Wired into build-preflight.sh (Phase 1.0D) and redbear-ci.yml, with a unit test (test-patch-sanity.sh). Skips archived/legacy trees and unvalidatable formats (empty placeholders, bare-@@ git hunks).
112 lines
3.8 KiB
C
112 lines
3.8 KiB
C
// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 %s \
|
|
// RUN: -analyzer-checker=core \
|
|
// RUN: -analyzer-checker=debug.ExprInspection \
|
|
// RUN: -analyzer-config eagerly-assume=false \
|
|
// RUN: -verify
|
|
|
|
void clang_analyzer_warnIfReached(void);
|
|
void clang_analyzer_eval(_Bool);
|
|
|
|
void test_simplification_adjustment_concrete_int(int b, int c) {
|
|
if (b < 0 || b > 1) // b: [0,1]
|
|
return;
|
|
if (c < -1 || c > 1) // c: [-1,1]
|
|
return;
|
|
if (c + b != 0) // c + b == 0
|
|
return;
|
|
clang_analyzer_warnIfReached(); // expected-warning{{REACHABLE}}
|
|
if (b != 1) // b == 1 --> c + 1 == 0 --> c == -1
|
|
return;
|
|
clang_analyzer_warnIfReached(); // expected-warning{{REACHABLE}}
|
|
clang_analyzer_eval(c == -1); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
|
|
|
|
// Keep the symbols and the constraints! alive.
|
|
(void)(b * c);
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void test_simplification_adjustment_range(int b, int c) {
|
|
if (b < 0 || b > 1) // b: [0,1]
|
|
return;
|
|
if (c < -1 || c > 1) // c: [-1,1]
|
|
return;
|
|
if (c + b < -1 || c + b > 0) // c + b: [-1,0]
|
|
return;
|
|
clang_analyzer_warnIfReached(); // expected-warning{{REACHABLE}}
|
|
if (b != 1) // b == 1 --> c + 1: [-1,0] --> c: [-2,-1]
|
|
return;
|
|
// c: [-2,-1] is intersected with the
|
|
// already associated range which is [-1,1],
|
|
// thus we get c: [-1,-1]
|
|
clang_analyzer_warnIfReached(); // expected-warning{{REACHABLE}}
|
|
clang_analyzer_eval(c == -1); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
|
|
|
|
// Keep the symbols and the constraints! alive.
|
|
(void)(b * c);
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void test_simplification_adjustment_to_infeasible_concrete_int(int b, int c) {
|
|
if (b < 0 || b > 1) // b: [0,1]
|
|
return;
|
|
if (c < 0 || c > 1) // c: [0,1]
|
|
return;
|
|
if (c + b != 0) // c + b == 0
|
|
return;
|
|
clang_analyzer_warnIfReached(); // expected-warning{{REACHABLE}}
|
|
if (b != 1) { // b == 1 --> c + 1 == 0 --> c == -1 contradiction
|
|
clang_analyzer_eval(b == 0); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
|
|
clang_analyzer_eval(c == 0); // expected-warning{{TRUE}}
|
|
// Keep the symbols and the constraints! alive.
|
|
(void)(b * c);
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
clang_analyzer_warnIfReached(); // no warning
|
|
|
|
// Keep the symbols and the constraints! alive.
|
|
(void)(b * c);
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void test_simplification_adjustment_to_infeassible_range(int b, int c) {
|
|
if (b < 0 || b > 1) // b: [0,1]
|
|
return;
|
|
if (c < 0 || c > 1) // c: [0,1]
|
|
return;
|
|
if (c + b < -1 || c + b > 0) // c + b: [-1,0]
|
|
return;
|
|
clang_analyzer_warnIfReached(); // expected-warning{{REACHABLE}}
|
|
if (b != 1) // b == 1 --> c + 1: [-1,0] --> c: [-2,-1] contradiction
|
|
return;
|
|
clang_analyzer_warnIfReached(); // no warning
|
|
|
|
// Keep the symbols and the constraints! alive.
|
|
(void)(b * c);
|
|
return;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
void test_simplification_adjusment_no_infinite_loop(int a, int b, int c) {
|
|
if (a == b) // a != b
|
|
return;
|
|
if (c != 0) // c == 0
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
if (b != 0) // b == 0
|
|
return;
|
|
// The above simplification of `b == 0` could result in an infinite loop
|
|
// unless we detect that the State is unchanged.
|
|
// The loop:
|
|
// 1) Simplification of the trivial equivalence class
|
|
// "symbol": "(reg_$0<int a>) == (reg_$1<int b>)", "range": "{ [0, 0] }"
|
|
// results in
|
|
// "symbol": "(reg_$0<int a>) == 0", "range": "{ [0, 0] }" }
|
|
// which in turn creates a non-trivial equivalence class
|
|
// [ "(reg_$0<int a>) == (reg_$1<int b>)", "(reg_$0<int a>) == 0" ]
|
|
// 2) We call assumeSymInclusiveRange("(reg_$0<int a>) == 0")
|
|
// and that calls **simplify** on the associated non-trivial equivalence
|
|
// class. During the simplification the State does not change, we reached
|
|
// the fixpoint.
|
|
|
|
(void)(a * b * c);
|
|
}
|