vasilito
25fb843c40
The prior commit switched the recipe to `[source] path = "source"`, but .gitignore:77 still listed `local/recipes/shells/brush/source` (a leftover from when brush was a transient upstream git fetch), so the vendored tree was not tracked — a fresh clone would have no brush source and the build would fail. Drop that ignore line and commit the vendored working tree (reubeno/brush @ 897b373e, with the Redox port patches pre-applied). brush is now a durable local fork like the other path=source recipes. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
53 lines
2.1 KiB
YAML
53 lines
2.1 KiB
YAML
name: Feature Request
|
|
description: Suggest a new feature or enhancement for brush
|
|
labels: ["enhancement"]
|
|
body:
|
|
- type: markdown
|
|
attributes:
|
|
value: |
|
|
Thanks for taking the time to suggest an improvement to brush! We welcome and appreciate all input and feedback. While we can't commit to prioritizing or implementing all such requests, we'd rather you make the suggestion than not.
|
|
|
|
Our only requests: (1) please ensure you follow our project's [Code of Conduct](https://github.com/reubeno/brush#coc-ov-file), and (2) before submitting, please [search existing issues](https://github.com/reubeno/brush/issues) to check if a similar request already exists. If it does, feel free to add a comment to the existing issue instead.
|
|
|
|
- type: textarea
|
|
id: description
|
|
attributes:
|
|
label: Feature description
|
|
description: A clear and concise description of the feature or enhancement you'd like.
|
|
placeholder: Describe the feature...
|
|
validations:
|
|
required: true
|
|
|
|
- type: textarea
|
|
id: use-case
|
|
attributes:
|
|
label: Use case / motivation
|
|
description: |
|
|
Why is this feature important to you? What problem does it solve? How would you use it?
|
|
|
|
Providing context helps us understand the value and prioritize accordingly.
|
|
placeholder: Explain why this feature would be useful...
|
|
validations:
|
|
required: true
|
|
|
|
- type: textarea
|
|
id: proposed-solution
|
|
attributes:
|
|
label: Proposed solution
|
|
description: >
|
|
If you have ideas on how this could be implemented or how it should work,
|
|
share them here. Note that this is purely optional.
|
|
placeholder: Describe how you think this could work...
|
|
validations:
|
|
required: false
|
|
|
|
- type: textarea
|
|
id: additional-context
|
|
attributes:
|
|
label: Additional context
|
|
description: >
|
|
Any other context, references, or screenshots that would help us understand your request.
|
|
For example, links to relevant documentation, other shells that implement this, etc.
|
|
validations:
|
|
required: false
|