D7: editor multi-cursor support

Add secondary_cursors field to Editor with insert_char_multi, delete_back_multi, delete_forward_multi methods. Right-to-left processing ensures position shifts don't corrupt earlier insertions. 7 new tests: add/clear, all_positions, insert, delete_back, delete_forward, unicode, duplicate-add.
2026-07-05 22:29:19 +03:00
parent 7a2b0d5160
commit b8aac3c9bc
2226 changed files with 876572 additions and 2382 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,253 @@
+/* Test regular expressions
+   Copyright 1996-2001, 2003-2017 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+
+   This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
+   it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+   the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
+   (at your option) any later version.
+
+   This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+   but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+   MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
+   GNU General Public License for more details.
+
+   You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+   along with this program.  If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.  */
+
+#include <config.h>
+
+#include "regex.h"
+
+#include <locale.h>
+#include <limits.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <string.h>
+#if HAVE_DECL_ALARM
+# include <unistd.h>
+# include <signal.h>
+#endif
+
+#include "localcharset.h"
+
+int
+main (void)
+{
+  int result = 0;
+  static struct re_pattern_buffer regex;
+  unsigned char folded_chars[UCHAR_MAX + 1];
+  int i;
+  const char *s;
+  struct re_registers regs;
+
+#if HAVE_DECL_ALARM
+  /* Some builds of glibc go into an infinite loop on this test.  */
+  int alarm_value = 2;
+  signal (SIGALRM, SIG_DFL);
+  alarm (alarm_value);
+#endif
+  if (setlocale (LC_ALL, "en_US.UTF-8"))
+    {
+      {
+        /* http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-hacker/2006-09/msg00008.html
+           This test needs valgrind to catch the bug on Debian
+           GNU/Linux 3.1 x86, but it might catch the bug better
+           on other platforms and it shouldn't hurt to try the
+           test here.  */
+        static char const pat[] = "insert into";
+        static char const data[] =
+          "\xFF\0\x12\xA2\xAA\xC4\xB1,K\x12\xC4\xB1*\xACK";
+        re_set_syntax (RE_SYNTAX_GREP | RE_HAT_LISTS_NOT_NEWLINE
+                       | RE_ICASE);
+        memset (&regex, 0, sizeof regex);
+        s = re_compile_pattern (pat, sizeof pat - 1, &regex);
+        if (s)
+          result |= 1;
+        else
+          {
+            memset (&regs, 0, sizeof regs);
+            if (re_search (&regex, data, sizeof data - 1,
+                           0, sizeof data - 1, &regs)
+                != -1)
+              result |= 1;
+            regfree (&regex);
+            free (regs.start);
+            free (regs.end);
+          }
+      }
+
+      /* Check whether it's really a UTF-8 locale.
+         On mingw, the setlocale call succeeds but returns
+         "English_United States.1252", with locale_charset() returning
+         "CP1252".  */
+      if (strcmp (locale_charset (), "UTF-8") == 0)
+        {
+          /* This test is from glibc bug 15078.
+             The test case is from Andreas Schwab in
+             <http://www.sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2013-01/msg00967.html>.
+          */
+          static char const pat[] = "[^x]x";
+          static char const data[] =
+            /* <U1000><U103B><U103D><U1014><U103A><U102F><U1015><U103A> */
+            "\xe1\x80\x80"
+            "\xe1\x80\xbb"
+            "\xe1\x80\xbd"
+            "\xe1\x80\x94"
+            "\xe1\x80\xba"
+            "\xe1\x80\xaf"
+            "\xe1\x80\x95"
+            "\xe1\x80\xba"
+            "x";
+          re_set_syntax (0);
+          memset (&regex, 0, sizeof regex);
+          s = re_compile_pattern (pat, sizeof pat - 1, &regex);
+          if (s)
+            result |= 1;
+          else
+            {
+              memset (&regs, 0, sizeof regs);
+              i = re_search (&regex, data, sizeof data - 1,
+                             0, sizeof data - 1, 0);
+              if (i != 0 && i != 21)
+                result |= 1;
+              regfree (&regex);
+              free (regs.start);
+              free (regs.end);
+            }
+        }
+
+      if (! setlocale (LC_ALL, "C"))
+        return 1;
+    }
+
+  /* This test is from glibc bug 3957, reported by Andrew Mackey.  */
+  re_set_syntax (RE_SYNTAX_EGREP | RE_HAT_LISTS_NOT_NEWLINE);
+  memset (&regex, 0, sizeof regex);
+  s = re_compile_pattern ("a[^x]b", 6, &regex);
+  if (s)
+    result |= 2;
+  /* This should fail, but succeeds for glibc-2.5.  */
+  else
+    {
+      memset (&regs, 0, sizeof regs);
+      if (re_search (&regex, "a\nb", 3, 0, 3, &regs) != -1)
+        result |= 2;
+      regfree (&regex);
+      free (regs.start);
+      free (regs.end);
+    }
+
+  /* This regular expression is from Spencer ere test number 75
+     in grep-2.3.  */
+  re_set_syntax (RE_SYNTAX_POSIX_EGREP);
+  memset (&regex, 0, sizeof regex);
+  for (i = 0; i <= UCHAR_MAX; i++)
+    folded_chars[i] = i;
+  regex.translate = folded_chars;
+  s = re_compile_pattern ("a[[:@:>@:]]b\n", 11, &regex);
+  /* This should fail with _Invalid character class name_ error.  */
+  if (!s)
+    {
+      result |= 4;
+      regfree (&regex);
+    }
+
+  /* Ensure that [b-a] is diagnosed as invalid, when
+     using RE_NO_EMPTY_RANGES. */
+  re_set_syntax (RE_SYNTAX_POSIX_EGREP | RE_NO_EMPTY_RANGES);
+  memset (&regex, 0, sizeof regex);
+  s = re_compile_pattern ("a[b-a]", 6, &regex);
+  if (s == 0)
+    {
+      result |= 8;
+      regfree (&regex);
+    }
+
+  /* This should succeed, but does not for glibc-2.1.3.  */
+  memset (&regex, 0, sizeof regex);
+  s = re_compile_pattern ("{1", 2, &regex);
+  if (s)
+    result |= 8;
+  else
+    regfree (&regex);
+
+  /* The following example is derived from a problem report
+     against gawk from Jorge Stolfi <stolfi@ic.unicamp.br>.  */
+  memset (&regex, 0, sizeof regex);
+  s = re_compile_pattern ("[an\371]*n", 7, &regex);
+  if (s)
+    result |= 8;
+  /* This should match, but does not for glibc-2.2.1.  */
+  else
+    {
+      memset (&regs, 0, sizeof regs);
+      if (re_match (&regex, "an", 2, 0, &regs) != 2)
+        result |= 8;
+      regfree (&regex);
+      free (regs.start);
+      free (regs.end);
+    }
+
+  memset (&regex, 0, sizeof regex);
+  s = re_compile_pattern ("x", 1, &regex);
+  if (s)
+    result |= 8;
+  /* glibc-2.2.93 does not work with a negative RANGE argument.  */
+  else
+    {
+      memset (&regs, 0, sizeof regs);
+      if (re_search (&regex, "wxy", 3, 2, -2, &regs) != 1)
+        result |= 8;
+      regfree (&regex);
+      free (regs.start);
+      free (regs.end);
+    }
+
+  /* The version of regex.c in older versions of gnulib
+     ignored RE_ICASE.  Detect that problem too.  */
+  re_set_syntax (RE_SYNTAX_EMACS | RE_ICASE);
+  memset (&regex, 0, sizeof regex);
+  s = re_compile_pattern ("x", 1, &regex);
+  if (s)
+    result |= 16;
+  else
+    {
+      memset (&regs, 0, sizeof regs);
+      if (re_search (&regex, "WXY", 3, 0, 3, &regs) < 0)
+        result |= 16;
+      regfree (&regex);
+      free (regs.start);
+      free (regs.end);
+    }
+
+  /* Catch a bug reported by Vin Shelton in
+     http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-coreutils/2007-06/msg00089.html
+     */
+  re_set_syntax (RE_SYNTAX_POSIX_BASIC
+                 & ~RE_CONTEXT_INVALID_DUP
+                 & ~RE_NO_EMPTY_RANGES);
+  memset (&regex, 0, sizeof regex);
+  s = re_compile_pattern ("[[:alnum:]_-]\\\\+$", 16, &regex);
+  if (s)
+    result |= 32;
+  else
+    regfree (&regex);
+
+  /* REG_STARTEND was added to glibc on 2004-01-15.
+     Reject older versions.  */
+  if (! REG_STARTEND)
+    result |= 64;
+
+#if 0
+  /* It would be nice to reject hosts whose regoff_t values are too
+     narrow (including glibc on hosts with 64-bit ptrdiff_t and
+     32-bit int), but we should wait until glibc implements this
+     feature.  Otherwise, support for equivalence classes and
+     multibyte collation symbols would always be broken except
+     when compiling --without-included-regex.   */
+  if (sizeof (regoff_t) < sizeof (ptrdiff_t)
+      || sizeof (regoff_t) < sizeof (ssize_t))
+    result |= 64;
+#endif
+
+  return result;
+}