acpi-rs: fix 3 panic sites referencing non-existent .opcode field

OpInFlight has no `opcode` field (it has `op: Opcode`), and at the logical-op
site `result` was referenced inside its own initializer (not yet in scope).
All three defensive _ => panic! arms now use `op.op` with {:?} (Opcode derives
Debug; {:#x} was invalid for the fieldless enum anyway), matching the
Opcode::* arms they follow. Fixes E0425 + two E0609 that failed `cook base`.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-07-28 08:05:07 +09:00
parent 6860e49623
commit 72d761f619
+3 -3
View File
@@ -2013,7 +2013,7 @@ where
Opcode::Or => left | right,
Opcode::Nor => !(left | right),
Opcode::Xor => left ^ right,
_ => panic!("acpi: unknown binary maths opcode {:#x}", op.opcode),
_ => panic!("acpi: unknown binary maths opcode {:?}", op.op),
};
let result = Object::Integer(result).wrap();
@@ -2057,7 +2057,7 @@ where
0
}
}
_ => panic!("acpi: unknown unary maths opcode {:#x}", op.opcode),
_ => panic!("acpi: unknown unary maths opcode {:?}", op.op),
};
context.contribute_arg(Argument::Object(Object::Integer(result).wrap()));
@@ -2131,7 +2131,7 @@ where
Opcode::LEqual => left == right,
Opcode::LGreater => left > right,
Opcode::LLess => left < right,
_ => panic!("acpi: unknown logical opcode {:#x}", result.opcode),
_ => panic!("acpi: unknown logical opcode {:?}", op.op),
};
let result = if result { Object::Integer(u64::MAX) } else { Object::Integer(0) };